FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>   >|  
ibes, regarded all their kings as gods on earth and paid them formal worship after their death; the later Egyptians, going a step further, worshipped them even in their lifetime as embodiments of the gods.[3] What is said in the liturgy for the deification of Unas is much the same as was said of other kings. The dead king in early Egypt becomes a god, even the greatest of the gods, and he assumes the name of that god[4]; he overcomes the other gods by brute force, he kills and devours them. This is very like what I think was the case with Zeus; the main difference is that in Egypt the _character_ of the deified king was merged in that of the old god, and men continued to regard the latter in exactly the same light as before; but among the forefathers of the Greeks the reverse happened in at least one case, that of Zeus, where the character of a hero who had peculiarly fascinated popular imagination partly eclipsed that of the old god whose name and rank he usurped. The reason for this, I suppose, is that even the early Egyptians had already a conservative religion with fixed traditions and a priesthood that forgot nothing,[5] whereas among the forefathers of the Greeks, who were wandering savages, social order and religion were in a very fluid state. However that may be, a deified hero might oust an older god and reign under his name; and this theory explains many difficulties in the legends of Zeus. [Footnote 2: Sir E. A. W. Budge, _Literature of the Ancient Egyptians_, p. 21 ff., and _Gods of the Egyptians_, i, pp. 32 f., 43.] [Footnote 3: Erman, _Handbook of Egyptian Religion_, p. 37 f.] [Footnote 4: Budge, _Lit. of the Egyptians_, p. 21; Erman, _ut supra_, p. 37 f.] [Footnote 5: It is even possible that in one case, that of Osiris, a hero in Egypt may have eclipsed by his personality the god whom he ousted. See Sir J. W. Frazer's _Adonis, Attis, Osiris_, ii, p. 200, and Sir W. Ridgeway's _Dramas and Dramatic Dances, etc._, p. 94 ff.] As to the Roman Iuppiter, I need not say much about him. Like all the genuine gods of Latium, he never was much more than an abstraction until the Greeks came with their literature and dressed him in the wardrobe of their Zeus. Coming now to Ushas, the Lady of the Dawn, and looking at her name from the standpoint of comparative philosophy, we see that the word _ushas_ is closely connected with the Greek [Greek: heos] and the Latin _aurora_. But when we read the literature,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31  
32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Egyptians
 
Footnote
 

Greeks

 

character

 

deified

 

Osiris

 

literature

 

eclipsed

 

religion

 
forefathers

Adonis
 

Literature

 

Frazer

 

Egyptian

 

personality

 
Religion
 

ousted

 

Ancient

 
Handbook
 

genuine


standpoint

 

comparative

 

Coming

 

philosophy

 
aurora
 

closely

 

connected

 

wardrobe

 

dressed

 

Iuppiter


Dramas
 
Dramatic
 
Dances
 

abstraction

 

Latium

 
Ridgeway
 

forgot

 

devours

 

greatest

 
assumes

overcomes

 
regard
 

continued

 

difference

 

merged

 
formal
 
worship
 
regarded
 

liturgy

 
deification