FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>  
on the subject of Personality, it will be apparent that the theory of Monism is in conflict with that of Theism only in so far as personality appears to imply limitation. This is a point which I have previously considered in these pages (Chapter iv, p. 109), with the result of appearing to show that the conflict is one which would probably vanish could we rise above the necessary limitations of human thought. Therefore, it here seems worth while to ask, What can be said by the philosophical theory of Monism to the old theological dilemma touching free-will and predestination? Or, even apart from any question of Theism, what position does Monism suppose the psychical activity of man to hold in relation to that of the universe? Of course the latter statement of the question is included in the former; and, therefore, we may present it thus;--If the human will is free, and the theory of Theism substantially true, how are we to reconcile the fact with the theory? According to the theory of Theism as sanctioned by Monism, what we apprehend as natural causation is the obverse of a part of a _summum genus_--i.e. the part falling within human observation whose whole is the Absolute Volition. This Volition, being absolute, can nowhere meet with restraint; it is therefore absolutely free, and can never contradict itself. Thus, those circumscribed portions of it which we know as human minds--and which, on account of being so circumscribed, are free within themselves--do not in their freedom conflict with the Absolute Volition. The Absolute Volition and the Relative Volition are always in unison. It is not that the Absolute Volition unconditionally determines the Relative Volition--else the Relative Volition would not be free; but it is that the Absolute Volition invariably assents to the Relative Volition as to the activity of an integral part of itself. This will be at once evident if we consider that our only idea of determination--i.e. causation--is, upon the theistic theory, derived from our observing the consistency of the Divine Will, whether as revealed subjectively in the causal operations of our own minds, or objectively in the causal operations of Nature. Therefore, the idea of causation as between the Absolute Volition and the Relative Volition is an idea destitute of meaning. One Relative Volition may act causally on another. Relative Volition, because each is wholly external to each. But all Relative Volitions are co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>  



Top keywords:
Volition
 

Relative

 

Absolute

 
theory
 
Monism
 
Theism
 

causation

 

conflict

 

Therefore

 

circumscribed


operations
 
question
 

activity

 

causal

 

unison

 

freedom

 

account

 

Volitions

 

absolute

 

observation


portions
 

contradict

 

restraint

 
absolutely
 

revealed

 
subjectively
 
Divine
 

derived

 

observing

 

consistency


causally

 

meaning

 
destitute
 
objectively
 

Nature

 
theistic
 

external

 

invariably

 

assents

 

unconditionally


determines

 

integral

 
determination
 

evident

 
wholly
 
present
 

vanish

 

appearing

 
limitations
 

thought