FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280  
281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   >>   >|  
feeling." FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 64: August 1, 1917, Pope Benedict XV sent a letter to the Powers urging them to bring the war to an end and outlining possible terms of settlement. On August 29th President Wilson sent his historic reply. This declared, in memorable language, that the Hohenzollern dynasty was unworthy of confidence and that the United States would have no negotiations with its representatives. It inferentially took the stand that the Kaiser must abdicate, or be deposed, and the German autocracy destroyed, as part of the conditions of peace.] [Footnote 65: On November 29, 1917, the London _Daily Telegraph_ published a letter from the Marquis of Lansdowne, which declared that the war had lasted too long and suggested that the British restate their war aims. This letter was severely condemned by the British press and by practically all representative British statesmen. It produced a most lamentable impression in the United States also.] [Footnote 66: Eugene C. Shoecraft, the Ambassador's secretary.] [Footnote 67: As related in Chapter XXII, page 267, President Wilson was informed of the so-called "secret treaties" by Mr. Balfour, in the course of his memorable visit to the White House.] CHAPTER XXV GETTING THE AMERICAN TROOPS TO FRANCE A group of letters, written at this time, touch upon a variety of topics which were then engaging the interest of all countries: _To Arthur W. Page_ London, January 19, 1918. DEAR ARTHUR: While your letter is still fresh in my mind I dictate the following in answer to your question about Palestine. It has not been settled--and cannot be, I fancy, until the Peace Conference--precisely what the British will do with Palestine, but I have what I think is a correct idea of their general attitude on the subject. First, of course, they do not propose to allow it to go back into Turkish hands; and the same can be said also of Armenia and possibly of Mesopotamia. Their idea of the future of Palestine is that whoever shall manage the country, or however it shall be managed, the Jews shall have the same chance as anybody else. Of course that's quite an advance for the Jews there, but their idea is not that the Jews should have command of other populations there or control over them--not in the least. My guess at the English wish, which I have every reason to believe i
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280  
281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letter

 

British

 
Footnote
 

Palestine

 
London
 

memorable

 

States

 
United
 

Wilson

 

August


declared

 

President

 

settled

 
question
 

Conference

 

precisely

 
ARTHUR
 

interest

 

engaging

 

countries


Arthur
 

variety

 
topics
 
dictate
 

January

 
answer
 

Turkish

 

advance

 

command

 

managed


chance

 

populations

 

reason

 
English
 

control

 

country

 

manage

 

propose

 

subject

 

correct


general

 

attitude

 
Mesopotamia
 

future

 

possibly

 

Armenia

 

called

 

abdicate

 

deposed

 
German