FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   >>  
he continual exercise of arms. They were all men of high distinction; and bound themselves by a vow to defend the frontier. They were forbidden by their rules to fly from the enemy, it being their duty to fight and die on the spot they held." In any case, whether the Christian military orders were derived from the Moorish, or the reverse, one thing is certain, that it was the Moors who inoculated the Christians with a belief in Holy Wars, as an essential part of their religion.[2] In this respect Christianity became Mohammedanized first in Spain. Chivalry became identified with war against the infidel, and found its apotheosis[3] in St. James of Compostella, who--a poor fisherman of Galilee--was supposed to have fought in person against the Moors at Clavijo.[4] In the ballad we hear of Christian knights coming to engage in fight from exactly that same belief in the efficacy and divine institution of holy wars, as animated the Arab champions. The clergy, and even the bishops, took up arms and fought against the enemies of their faith. Two bishops, those of Leon and Astorga,[5] were taken prisoners at the battle of Val de Junqueras (921).[6] Sisenandus of Compostella was killed in battle against the Northmen (979); and the "Chronicle of the Cid" makes repeated mention of a right valiant prelate named Hieronymus.[7] [1] Conde, ii. p. 119, note--"It seems highly probable that from these arose the military orders of Spain in the East." Cp. Prescott, "Ferd. and Isab.," p. 122. The military orders of Spain were mostly instituted by papal bulls in the last half of the 12th century. [2] Islam made Christianity military, Milman, "Lat. Chr.," ii. pp. 220-2. Lecky, "Hist. Eur. Moral," p. 262, ff. [3] Presc., "Ferd.," p. 15. [4] Mohammed also imagined celestial aid in battle, see Kor. iii., ad init. [5] "Rodrigo of Toledo," iii. p. 4. Johannes Vasaeus says they were the bishops of Tuy and Salamanca. [6] Mariana, viii. 5. See also _Ibid._, c. 6. [7] "Chronicle of Cid" (Southey), p. 371. Yet, in spite of all this, in spite of the fanaticism which engendered and accompanied it, chivalry proved to be the only common ground on which Christian and Moslem, Arab and European, could meet. It was in fact a sort of compromise between two incompatible religions mutually accepted by two different races. Though perhaps not a spiritual religion, it was a social one, and se
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154  
155   156   157   158   159   >>  



Top keywords:

military

 

Christian

 

bishops

 

battle

 

orders

 

belief

 

Christianity

 

religion

 
Compostella
 

Chronicle


fought
 

Milman

 

Mohammed

 
probable
 

highly

 
Prescott
 
century
 

instituted

 

compromise

 

European


Moslem

 

common

 
ground
 

incompatible

 
spiritual
 

social

 

Though

 

religions

 
mutually
 

accepted


proved

 

chivalry

 

Toledo

 

Rodrigo

 

Johannes

 

Vasaeus

 

celestial

 

Salamanca

 
fanaticism
 
engendered

accompanied

 

Southey

 

Mariana

 

imagined

 

Christians

 

essential

 

inoculated

 

reverse

 

respect

 

apotheosis