FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323  
324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>   >|  
In addition to this the circumstance that all criminal causes in the islands had to be sent for review to the proper _audiencia_, caused a large accumulation of old cases in these higher courts, and this alone made their disposition a matter of some years. To-day the procedure is rapid. Information having been brought against the defendant, the trial is had in the same term or at most during the next term of court. Sometimes the trial is suspended owing to the non-appearance of witnesses, but it can be said that cases are rare where causes are pending in the docket of the court for a longer period than two terms. Causes appealed to the Supreme Court are disposed of promptly, and as a general rule it does not take over six months to get a decision. Defendants in criminal cases have now been granted by the Philippine Bill certain fundamentally important rights which they did not formerly enjoy; namely, to appear and defend in person or by counsel at every stage of the proceedings; to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to testify as witnesses in their own behalf; to be exempt from testifying against themselves; to be confronted at the trial by, and to cross-examine, the witnesses against them; to have compulsory process issue for obtaining witnesses in their own favour; to have speedy and public trials; to be admitted to bail with sufficient sureties in all cases, except for capital offences. None of these rights were enjoyed under the procedure in effect during the Spanish regime. A man was prosecuted without being notified of the charges against him, and he was only made aware of the case against him after the _sumario_. When all of the evidence of the prosecution had been taken the accused was heard in his own defence. He was compelled to testify, and was subjected to a very inquisitorial examination, including questions which incriminated him. Although he had the right to compel witnesses for the prosecution to ratify over their signatures the evidence against him given during the _sumario_, as the defence of the majority of the accused was in the hands of attorneys _de officio_ they nearly always renounced this privilege of the defendant, and, as has already been said, bail was not admitted in any grave offence during the trial. No sentence of acquittal in a criminal case can now be appealed from by the government. Under the Spanish system sentences of acquittal of courts of first instance ha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323  
324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

witnesses

 

criminal

 
admitted
 

testify

 

accused

 
sumario
 
Spanish
 
rights
 

appealed

 

prosecution


evidence
 

defence

 

courts

 
acquittal
 
procedure
 
defendant
 
effect
 

regime

 

sentences

 
enjoyed

system

 

government

 

sentence

 

prosecuted

 

offences

 
capital
 

speedy

 

public

 

favour

 

obtaining


process

 

trials

 
instance
 

sufficient

 

sureties

 

signatures

 

offence

 
subjected
 

inquisitorial

 

compelled


officio

 

examination

 

questions

 

incriminated

 

including

 
compulsory
 
attorneys
 

ratify

 

notified

 

charges