October_ 19, 1888."
In order that this episode should have its rightful effect, and no more,
it is needful that several things should be borne in mind. In the first
place, the action was in a Court of Equity. It was not a prosecution in
a Criminal Court. The decision of the Court was not a verdict of guilty
against a prisoner, to be followed by punishment for wrong-doing, but an
order to refund certain money. In ordinary circumstances a judgment of
this kind does not brand a man with infamy, nor affect his character and
position in the eyes of society. Again, after the judgment of the Court,
Home promptly repaid the money. He had not appropriated or expended any
part of it. What more could he have done?
Mr. Myers' remark in "Human Personality"--"The most serious blot on
Home's character was that revealed by the Lyon case"[38]--seems,
therefore, rather severe under the circumstances. Especially as Mr.
Myers has expressed himself so strongly in favour of the reality of the
Home phenomena, and has said, in conjunction with Professor Barrett,
that they found no allegations of fraud on which they were justified in
laying much stress. Much more to the purpose is Mr. H. Arthur Smith's
comment: "Whether this is to Home's discredit or not of course will be
decided according to one's belief in Spiritualism and the reality of her
husband's interference."
Had this Report of Professor Barrett's and Mr. Myers', with its
Appendices, been placed before the public, it might have mitigated the
prejudice which hangs about the name of D. D. Home in the minds of so
many. The unique position which Home occupies in regard to the Physical
Phenomena of Spiritualism seems a sufficient reason for dwelling
somewhat fully on this episode as it affects his character as a man.
FOOTNOTES:
[22] Report of the Committee of the London Dialectical Society, pp.
360-363.
[23] Vol. iv. pp. 101-136.
[24] _Journal S.P.R._, vol. iv. pp. 249-252.
[25] Ibid., p. 115.
[26] "Human Personality," vol. ii. p. 579.
[27] _Journal S.P.R._, vol. iv. p. 102.
[28] "Human Personality," vol. ii. pp. 580-581.
[29] Ibid., p. 581.
[30] _Journal S.P.R._, vol. iv. p. 107.
[31] _Journal S.P.R._, vol. iv. p. 114.
[32] Ibid., p. 115.
[33] _Journal S.P.R._, vol. iv. p. 122.
[34] _Journal S.P.R._, vol. iv. pp. 135-136.
[35] _Journal S.P.R._, vol. iv. p. 108.
[36] Report of the Committee of the Dialectical Society, p. 214.
[37] _Journal S.
|