FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086  
1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   >>   >|  
rritory at that time. The political parties realized the necessity of putting their best men to the front, and it was fully conceded that ethics had become a factor in politics. Prior to the Legislature of 1886 some discussion arose as to the constitutionality of the Equal Suffrage Law, and, in order to remove all doubt, a strengthening Act was passed, which was approved by Gov. Watson C. Squire, November 29. On Feb. 3, 1887, the case of _Harlan vs. Washington_ came before the Territorial Supreme Court. Harlan had been convicted of carrying on a swindling game by a jury composed of both men and women, and he contested the verdict on the ground that women were not legal voters. The Supreme Court, whose _personnel_ had been entirely changed through a new Presidential administration, decided that the law conferring the elective franchise upon them was void because it had not been fully described in its title. This decision also rendered void nineteen other laws which had been enacted under the same conditions. The members of the next Legislature had been elected so long before the rendering of this decision that their seats could not be contested; and as their election had been by both men and women they were determined to re-establish the law which the Supreme Court had ruthlessly overthrown. Therefore the Equal Suffrage Law was re-enacted, perfectly titled and worded, and was approved by Gov. Eugene Semple, Jan. 18, 1888. The members of a convention to prepare a State constitution were soon to be chosen, and the opponents of woman suffrage were most anxious to have the question considered by the Supreme Court before the election of the delegates. They arranged that the judges of the spring municipal election in a certain precinct should refuse to accept the vote of a Mrs. Nevada Bloomer, the wife of a saloon-keeper and herself an avowed opponent of woman suffrage. This was done on April 3, and she brought suit against them. The case was rushed through, and on August 14 the Supreme Court decided that the Act of January 18 was invalid, as a Territorial Legislature had no right to enfranchise women, and that in consequence the Equal Suffrage Law was void. The Judges responsible for this decision were Associate Justices George Turner and William G. Langford. The very Act of Congress which organized the Territory of Washington stated explicitly that, at elections subsequent to the first, _all persons should be all
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   1068   1069   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080   1081   1082   1083   1084   1085   1086  
1087   1088   1089   1090   1091   1092   1093   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104   1105   1106   1107   1108   1109   1110   1111   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Supreme

 

Suffrage

 

decision

 

election

 

Legislature

 

Harlan

 
suffrage
 

enacted

 
Washington
 

Territorial


decided

 
contested
 
members
 
approved
 

worded

 
delegates
 

subsequent

 
persons
 

arranged

 

titled


Therefore
 

precinct

 

municipal

 

spring

 

considered

 

perfectly

 

judges

 

anxious

 
opponents
 

prepare


chosen

 

constitution

 

convention

 

Eugene

 

Semple

 

question

 

Bloomer

 

invalid

 
Congress
 
January

rushed
 

August

 
enfranchise
 
consequence
 

responsible

 
Associate
 

Justices

 

Turner

 

Judges

 
Langford