FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355  
356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   >>   >|  
ns which describe the last judgment are a protest against the exclusion of woman from teaching in the church. "I suffer not a woman to teach, but to be in silence," said a writer in the New Testament. The sentence has brought manifold evil in its train. So much for the employments of women. * * * * * By nature, woman has the same political rights that man has--to vote, to hold office, to make and administer laws. These she has as a matter of right. The strong hand and the great head of man keep her down; nothing more. In America, in Christendom, woman has no political rights, is not a citizen in full; she has no voice in making or administering the laws, none in electing the rulers or administrators thereof. She can hold no office--can not be committee of a primary school, overseer of the poor, or guardian to a public lamp-post. But any man, with conscience enough to keep out of jail, mind enough to escape the poor-house, and body enough to drop his ballot into the box, he is a voter. He may have no character--even no money; that is no matter--he is male. The noblest woman has no voice in the State. Men make laws, disposing of her property, her person, her children; still she must bear it, "with a patient shrug." Looking at it as a matter of pure right and pure science, I know no reason why woman should not be a voter, or hold office, or make and administer laws. I do not see how I can shut myself into political privileges and shut woman out, and do both in the name of inalienable right. Certainly, every woman has a natural right to have her property represented in the general representation of property, and her person represented in the general representation of persons. Looking at it as a matter of expediency, see some facts. Suppose woman had a share in the municipal regulation of Boston, and there were as many alderwomen as aldermen, as many common council women as common council men, do you believe that, in defiance of the law of Massachusetts, the city government, last spring, would have licensed every two hundred and forty-fourth person of the population of the city to sell intoxicating drink? would have made every thirty-fifth voter a rum-seller? I do not. Do you believe the women of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355  
356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

matter

 

office

 
political
 

property

 

person

 
general
 
represented
 
representation
 

administer

 

rights


Looking
 

common

 

council

 
children
 
disposing
 
noblest
 
privileges
 

reason

 

science

 
patient

Suppose

 

government

 

spring

 

licensed

 

Massachusetts

 
defiance
 

hundred

 

thirty

 

intoxicating

 

population


fourth

 

aldermen

 
alderwomen
 

expediency

 

persons

 

Certainly

 

natural

 
Boston
 

seller

 

regulation


municipal

 

inalienable

 

brought

 

manifold

 

employments

 
strong
 
nature
 

sentence

 

Testament

 

protest