FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042  
1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   >>   >|  
HOWARD CROSBY. 116 East 19th, N. Y., _March 14, '81_. The world still asks, What is Truth? A work has recently been published entitled, "The Christian Religion to A.D. 200." It is the fruit of several-years' study of a period upon which the Church has but little record. It finds no evidence of the existence of the New Testament in its present form during that time; neither does it find evidence that the Gospels in their present form date from the lives of their professed authors. All Biblical scholars acknowledge that the world possesses no record or tradition of the original manuscripts of the New Testament, and that to attempt to reestablish the old text is hopeless. No reference by writers to any part of the New Testament as authoritative is found earlier than the third century (A.D. 202). The first collection, or canon, of the New Testament was prepared by the Synod or Council of Laodicea in the fourth century (A.D. 360). It entirely omitted the Book of Revelation from the list of sacred works. This book has met a similar fate from many sources, not being printed in the Syriac Testament as late as 1562. Amid this vast discrepancy in regard to the truth of the Scriptures themselves; with no Hebrew manuscript older than the twelfth century; with no Greek one older than the fourth; with the acknowledgment by scholars of 7,000 errors in the Old Testament, and 150,000 in the New; with assurance that these interpolations and changes have been made by men in the interest of creeds, we may well believe that the portions of the Bible quoted against woman's equality are but interpolations of an unscrupulous priesthood, for the purpose of holding her in subjection to man. Amid this conflict of authority over texts of Scripture we have been taught to believe divinely inspired, destroying our faith in doctrines heretofore declared essential to salvation, how can we be sure that the forthcoming version of the Bible from the masculine revisers of our day will be more trustworthy than those which have been accepted as of Divine origin in the past? This chapter is condensed from the writer's forthcoming work, "WOMAN, CHURCH, AND STATE." FOOTNOTES: [178] Maine (Gaius) says of the position of woman under Roman law before the introduction of Christianity: "The juriconsulists had evidently at this time assumed the equality of the sexes as a principle of the code of equity. The situation of th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038   1039   1040   1041   1042  
1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   1064   1065   1066   1067   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Testament

 

century

 
evidence
 

forthcoming

 

scholars

 

fourth

 

present

 
equality
 

record

 

interpolations


conflict

 

subjection

 

assurance

 

acknowledgment

 
taught
 

Scripture

 

authority

 

errors

 

creeds

 

interest


quoted

 

portions

 
divinely
 
purpose
 
priesthood
 

unscrupulous

 
holding
 

version

 
position
 
FOOTNOTES

introduction
 

Christianity

 
principle
 
equity
 

situation

 

assumed

 
juriconsulists
 
evidently
 

CHURCH

 
masculine

salvation

 

essential

 

destroying

 

doctrines

 

heretofore

 

declared

 
revisers
 

origin

 
chapter
 

condensed