FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927  
928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   >>   >|  
owed, and prefaced her remarks by saying: "Ours has always been a free platform. We have believed in the fullest freedom of thought and in the free expression of individual opinion. I propose to speak upon the subject discussed by our friend, Mrs. Stanton. It is often said that there are two sides to every question; but there are three sides, many sides, to every question. Let Mrs. Stanton take hers; let Horace Greeley take his; I only ask the privilege of stating mine. (Applause). I have embodied my thought, hastily, in a series of resolutions,[170] and my remarks following them will be very brief." Mrs. Blackwell continued: I believe that the highest laws of life are those which we find written within our being; that the first moral laws which we are to obey are the laws which God's own finger has traced upon our own souls. Therefore, our first duty is to ourselves, and we may never, under any circumstances, yield this to any other. I say we are first responsible to ourselves, and to the God who has laid the obligation upon us, to make ourselves the grandest we may. Marriage grows out of the relations of parties. The law of our development comes wholly from within; but the relation of marriage supposes two persons as being united to each other, and from this relation originates the law. Mrs. Stanton calls marriage a "tie." No, marriage is a _relation_; and, once formed, that relation continues as long as the parties continue with the natures which they now essentially have. Let, then, the two parties deliberately, voluntarily consent to enter into this relation. It is one which, from its very nature, must be permanent. Can the mother ever destroy the relation which exists between herself and her child? Can the father annul the relation which exists between himself and his child? Then, can the father and mother annul the relation which exists between themselves, the parents of the child? It can not be. The interests of marriage are such that they can not be destroyed, and the only question must be, "Has there been a marriage in this case or not?" If there has, then the social law, the obligations growing out of the relation, must be life-long. But I assert that every woman, in the present state of society, is bound to maintain her own independence and her own integrity of ch
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   903   904   905   906   907   908   909   910   911   912   913   914   915   916   917   918   919   920   921   922   923   924   925   926   927  
928   929   930   931   932   933   934   935   936   937   938   939   940   941   942   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
relation
 
marriage
 
Stanton
 

exists

 
question
 

parties

 
mother
 
father
 

thought

 

remarks


natures

 
society
 

assert

 

continue

 

present

 
continues
 

formed

 

united

 

independence

 

maintain


integrity

 

wholly

 

supposes

 

originates

 

persons

 

growing

 

interests

 

permanent

 
nature
 
parents

destroy

 
social
 

obligations

 

essentially

 

deliberately

 

consent

 

destroyed

 

voluntarily

 

Horace

 

Greeley


embodied

 
hastily
 

series

 

Applause

 

privilege

 
stating
 
friend
 

discussed

 

platform

 
prefaced