FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  
ility of the proposed changes shall be submitted as a clear issue. The principle, broadly stated, is that Parliament ought to exercise in any important matter its constituent powers only under the sanction of direct popular mandate. It was essentially in deference to this principle that the elections of December, 1910, turning squarely upon the issue of the reform of the House of Lords, were ordered. Thus, while in numerous continental countries the distinction between constituent and legislative functions is being nowadays somewhat relaxed, in Great Britain there is distinctly a tendency to establish in a measure a differentiation in this matter which long has been in practice non-existent. [Footnote 56: "In England the Parliament has an acknowledged right to modify the constitution; as, therefore, the constitution may undergo perpetual changes, it does not in reality exist (_elle n'existe point_); the Parliament is at once a legislative and a constituent assembly." OEuvres Completes; I., 166-167.] [Footnote 57: Lowell, Government of England, I., 2.] In effect, every measure of Parliament, of whatsoever nature and under whatsoever circumstances enacted, is "constitutional," in the sense that it is legally valid and enforceable. When an Englishman asserts of a measure that it is unconstitutional he means only that it is inconsistent with a previous enactment, an established usage, the principles of international law, or the commonly accepted standards of morality. Such a measure, if passed in due form by Parliament, becomes an integral part of the law of the land, and as such will be enforced by the courts. There is no means by which it may be rendered of no effect, save repeal by the same or a succeeding parliament. In England, as in European countries generally, the judicial tribunals are endowed with no power to pass upon the constitutional validity of legislative acts. Every such act is _ipso facto_ valid, whether it relates to the most trivial subject of ordinary legislation or to the organic arrangements of the state; and no person or body, aside from Parliament itself, possesses a right to override it or to set it aside.[58] [Footnote 58: For brief discussions of the general nature of the English co
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88  
89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Parliament

 

measure

 

Footnote

 
England
 
constituent
 

legislative

 

countries

 

constitution

 
matter
 

nature


principle
 

constitutional

 

whatsoever

 

effect

 

passed

 

integral

 

discussions

 

general

 
international
 

inconsistent


previous

 

unconstitutional

 

asserts

 

enforceable

 

Englishman

 

enactment

 

established

 

accepted

 

standards

 

morality


commonly

 

principles

 
English
 

enforced

 

relates

 

trivial

 

subject

 
ordinary
 
legislation
 

possesses


person

 
organic
 

arrangements

 

validity

 
rendered
 
repeal
 

override

 

courts

 

succeeding

 

parliament