FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54  
55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   >>   >|  
and has no bearing on the fact that it is being traced. This point is illustrated further in figure 289. This pattern shows an inner tracing. It will be noted that the delta is at the point on the first recurve nearest to the center of the divergence of the type lines. It will be further noted that tracing begins at the point of delta on the left and continues toward the right, passing inside of the right delta, with three ridges intervening between the tracing ridge and the right delta. This shows the tracing to be an inner tracing. If, in this case, the type line were traced (which would be the incorrect procedure), only two ridges would intervene between the tracing ridge and the right delta, resulting in an erroneous meeting tracing. Figure 290 is another example of the application of this rule. This illustration is also an inner whorl. When the ridge traced ends abruptly, and it is determined that the ridge definitely ends, the tracing drops down to the point on the next lower ridge immediately beneath the point where the ridge above ends, continuing from there. Figure 291, therefore, is an outer whorl. [Illustration: 288] [Illustration: 289] In this connection it should be noted that the rule for dropping to the next lower line applies only when the ridge _definitely_ ends. Short breaks in a ridge which may be due to improper inking, the presence of foreign matter on the ridges, enlarged pores, disease, or worn ridges should not be considered as definite ridge endings. The determination of what constitutes a definite ending will depend, of course, upon the good judgment of the classifier. When the question arises as to whether a break encountered in the ridge tracing is a definite ending, or whether there has been interference with a natural impression, the whole pattern should be examined to ascertain whether such breaks are general throughout the pattern. If they are found to be common, consideration should then be given to the possibility that the break is not a definite ridge ending. Appropriate reference tracing should be done in all such cases. [Illustration: 290] [Illustration: 291] Whenever the ridge traced bifurcates, the rule for tracing requires that the lower limb or branch proceeding from the bifurcation be followed. This is illustrated in 292. [Illustration: 292] Accidentals often possess three or more deltas. In tracing them only the extreme deltas are considered, the tracing b
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54  
55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

tracing

 
Illustration
 

definite

 
ridges
 

traced

 

ending

 
pattern
 

breaks

 

Figure

 

considered


illustrated

 
deltas
 

arises

 

Accidentals

 

possess

 

classifier

 

question

 
endings
 

extreme

 

determination


depend

 

constitutes

 

judgment

 

natural

 

common

 
consideration
 
Whenever
 

reference

 
Appropriate
 

possibility


general
 

bifurcates

 

impression

 

interference

 
examined
 

bifurcation

 

requires

 

branch

 
proceeding
 

ascertain


encountered

 
incorrect
 

intervening

 

passing

 

inside

 
procedure
 

meeting

 
erroneous
 

intervene

 

resulting