FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  
ntains a specific prohibition. The general provisions are as follows:-- "The progress of civilisation should have the effect of alleviating as much as possible the calamities of war. The only legitimate object which States should set before themselves during war is to weaken the military forces of the enemy. For this purpose it is sufficient to disable the greatest possible number of men. This object would be exceeded by the employment of arms which would uselessly aggravate the sufferings of disabled men or render their death inevitable. The employment of such arms would, therefore, be contrary to the laws of humanity." (St. Petersburg Declaration, 1868. Preamble.) "The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited." (Hague _Reglement_, Art. 22.) "Besides the prohibitions provided by special conventions [the Declaration of St. Petersburg alone answers to this description] it is in particular prohibited (_e_) to employ arms, projectiles, or material of a nature to cause superfluous injury." (_Ib._ Art. 23.) The only special prohibition is that contained in the Declaration of St. Petersburg, by which the contracting parties-- "Engage mutually to renounce, in case of war among themselves, the employment by their military or naval forces of any projectile of a weight below 400 grammes which is either explosive or charged with fulminating or inflammable substances." No one, so far as I am aware, has any wish to employ a bullet weighing less than 14 oz. which is either explosive or charged as above. So far, therefore, as the generally accepted laws of warfare are concerned, the only question as to the employment of Dum Dum or other expanding bullets is whether they "uselessly aggravate the sufferings of disabled men, or render their death inevitable"; in other words, whether they are "of a nature to cause superfluous injury." It is, however, probable that people who glibly talk of such bullets being "prohibited by The Hague Convention" are hazily reminiscent, not of the _Reglement_ appended to that convention, but of a certain "Declaration," signed by the delegates of many of the Powers represented at The Hague in 1899, to the effect that-- "The contracting Powers renounce the use of bullets which expand or flatten easily in the hu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

employment

 

Declaration

 

Petersburg

 

bullets

 

prohibition

 

inevitable

 

disabled

 

sufferings

 

render

 

explosive


Reglement
 

contracting

 

renounce

 
charged
 

injury

 

superfluous

 

prohibited

 

special

 
employ
 

nature


aggravate

 

uselessly

 
forces
 

military

 

Powers

 
object
 

effect

 

delegates

 

weighing

 

bullet


reminiscent
 

substances

 
inflammable
 
fulminating
 

appended

 

convention

 

expand

 

signed

 

represented

 

probable


people
 

flatten

 

expanding

 

generally

 
accepted
 

hazily

 

warfare

 

concerned

 

glibly

 
question