FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334  
335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   >>  
s, with the exception of the State of Vermont, where the male heir inherits a double portion. (Kent's "Commentaries," vol. iv. p. 370.) Mr. Kent, in the same work, vol. iv. p. 1-22, gives a historical account of American legislation on the subject of entail: by this we learn that, previous to the Revolution, the colonies followed the English law of entail. Estates tail were abolished in Virginia in 1776, on a motion of Mr. Jefferson. They were suppressed in New York in 1786, and have since been abolished in North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia, and Missouri. In Vermont, Indiana, Illinois, South Carolina, and Louisiana, entail was never introduced. Those States which thought proper to preserve the English law of entail, modified it in such a way as to deprive it of its most aristocratic tendencies. "Our general principles on the subject of government," says Mr. Kent, "tend to favor the free circulation of property." It cannot fail to strike the French reader who studies the law of inheritance, that on these questions the French legislation is infinitely more democratic even than the American. The American law makes an equal division of the father's property, but only in the case of his will not being known; "for every man," says the law, "in the State of New York (Revised Statutes, vol. iii. Appendix, p. 51), has entire liberty, power, and authority, to dispose of his property by will, to leave it entire, or divided in favor of any persons he chooses as his heirs, provided he do not leave it to a political body or any corporation." The French law obliges the testator to divide his property equally, or nearly so, among his heirs. Most of the American republics still admit of entails, under certain restrictions; but the French law prohibits entail in all cases. If the social condition of the Americans is more democratic than that of the French, the laws of the latter are the most democratic of the two. This may be explained more easily than at first appears to be the case. In France, democracy is still occupied in the work of destruction; in America, it reigns quietly over the ruins it has made. Appendix H Summary Of The Qualifications Of Voters In The United States As They Existed In 1832 All the States agree in granting the right of voting at the age of twenty-one. In all of them it is necessary to have resided for a certain time in the district where the vote is given. This period varies from thre
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334  
335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   >>  



Top keywords:

French

 

entail

 
American
 

property

 

democratic

 
States
 
abolished
 
entire
 

Carolina

 

English


Vermont
 

Appendix

 

legislation

 
subject
 
restrictions
 
prohibits
 
chooses
 

entails

 

provided

 
authority

political

 

liberty

 

republics

 

divide

 

equally

 
testator
 

obliges

 

corporation

 

persons

 

divided


dispose

 

France

 
granting
 

voting

 

Voters

 

United

 

Existed

 
twenty
 

period

 

varies


district

 

resided

 

Qualifications

 

Summary

 

explained

 
easily
 
social
 

condition

 

Americans

 

appears