FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   >>  
g words) to escape from such claimant, as, for instance, refusing to join in a slave-hunt when required, shall be fined not exceeding $1,000, be imprisoned six months, and pay the claimant $1,000. I hope, Sir, you are now able to perceive that your law has a preeminence in barbarity over its predecessor. And now, Sir, please to recollect, that party discipline, aided by the influence of Messrs. Webster and Clay, and the factory and cotton interest of Boston and New York, could not procure for this atrocious law the votes of _one half_ the members of the House of Representatives. Of two hundred and thirty-two members, only one hundred and nine dared to place their names on an enduring and shameful record, while many basely deserted their seats, fearing alike to vote either for or against it. You, Sir, following Mr. Webster's advice, "conquered your prejudices," and in company with _two_ more Northern Whigs, one of them a native of Virginia, cast your vote for this bill of abominations. But, although you voted for the law, you do not wish your constituents to suppose you approved of it. "It will not, I trust, be inferred from any thing I have said, that I consider the law which has passed unexceptionable. There are amendments which I strongly desire to be introduced into it." What are the exceptionable features of the law, what are the amendments you desire, you refrain from specifying. But you tell us that you would have labored for these amendments "had it been possible, but every body knows that it was _impracticable_." You allude to the _previous question_, which prevented both discussion and amendments. But why, then, did you vote for an objectionable bill which could not be amended? Here, again, we have one of your unfortunate reasons. "I deem conformity to the design of the Constitution more important than the objectionable details of the bill." So, by your own confession, had there been no previous question, you would have swallowed the bill with all its objectionable details, out of reverence for the _design_ of the Constitution, although that design neither embraced nor required a single one of those details. Did you, Sir, vote _against_ the previous question? On this point you are silent, and the minutes afford no information; but _if_ you did, your vote was a most remarkable aberration from your proslavery course in Congress. _After_ the previous question had been seconded, it was moved to lay the bill on the ta
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   >>  



Top keywords:

previous

 

amendments

 

question

 

objectionable

 

details

 
design
 

required

 

Constitution

 
hundred
 

desire


Webster

 

claimant

 

members

 
allude
 

impracticable

 
labored
 

unexceptionable

 

features

 
exceptionable
 

strongly


introduced

 

passed

 

refrain

 

silent

 

minutes

 

afford

 

information

 

single

 
seconded
 

Congress


remarkable

 
aberration
 

proslavery

 

embraced

 

unfortunate

 

reasons

 

amended

 

discussion

 

conformity

 

swallowed


reverence

 

confession

 

important

 
prevented
 

company

 

discipline

 
influence
 
recollect
 

barbarity

 

predecessor