FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139  
140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   >>   >|  
e who looks carefully into the past that sex occupied a large share of the consciousness of primitive races. The elaborate courtship rites and sex festivals alone give proof of this. It is, unfortunately, impossible for me to follow this question and give examples. I must refer the reader to H. Ellis's _Psychology of Sex_, Vol. III. pp. 34-44, where a number of typical cases are given of the courtship customs of the primitive peoples. See also Thomas, _Sex and Society_, chapter on "The Psychology of Exogamy," pp. 175-179. [98] This is the mistake that Westermark--in his valuable _History of Human Marriage_--as well as many writers have fallen into; assuming that because monogamy is found among man's nearest ancestors, the anthropoid apes, primitive human groups must have had a tendency towards monogamy. Whereas the exact opposite of this is true. There is, it would seem, a deeply rooted dislike in studying sex matters to face truth. This habit of fear explains the many elaborate efforts undertaken to establish the theory that primitive races practised a stricter sexual code than the facts prove. Letourneau, in _The Evolution of Marriage_, appears to adopt this view, and forces evidence in trying to prove the non-existence of a widespread early period of promiscuity (pp. 37-44). Mention may be made, on the other side, of Iwan Bloch, who, writing from a different standpoint and much deeper psychology, has no doubt at all of the early existence of, and even the continued tendency towards, promiscuity.--_The Sexual Life of Our Times_, pp. 188-195. [99] Our knowledge of the habits of primitive races has increased greatly of late years. The classical works of Bachofen, Waitz, Kulischer, Giraud-Teulon, von Hellwald, Krauss, Ploss-Bartels and other ethnologists, and the investigation of Morgan, McLennan, Mueller, and many others, have opened up wide sources of information. [100] Thomas, _Sex and Society_, p. 68, and Letourneau, _Evolution of Marriage_, pp. 269-270, 320. [101] Lubbock, _Origin of Civilisation_, p. 9. [102] This opinion is founded on the anthropological investigations during the past half century. See Hartland, _Primitive Paternity_, Vol. I. pp. 256-257; H. Ellis, _Psychology of Sex_, Vol. VI. pp. 390-382, and "The Changing Status of Women," _Westminster Review_, October 1886; Thomas, _Sex and Society_, p. 58, and Bloch, _Sexual History of our Times_, pp. 190-196. [103] For a full and illuminative t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139  
140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

primitive

 

Society

 

Marriage

 

Thomas

 

Psychology

 

promiscuity

 

Sexual

 

History

 
tendency
 

courtship


existence
 

Evolution

 

monogamy

 
Letourneau
 

elaborate

 
Bachofen
 
classical
 

Teulon

 

Krauss

 

Bartels


Hellwald

 

Kulischer

 
Giraud
 

ethnologists

 
writing
 

psychology

 

standpoint

 

deeper

 
habits
 

increased


greatly

 

knowledge

 

continued

 

Changing

 

Status

 

Hartland

 

century

 

Primitive

 
Paternity
 
Westminster

Review

 

illuminative

 

October

 

sources

 

information

 

opened

 

Morgan

 

McLennan

 

Mueller

 

opinion