FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416  
417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   >>   >|  
bstance. The Stoics, therefore, regarded all existence as reducible, in its last analysis, to _one substance_, which on the side of its passivity and capacity of change, they called _hyle_ (yle);[828] and on the side of its changeless energy and immutable order, they called God. The corporeal world--physical nature--is "a peculiar manifestation" of God, generated from his own substance, and, after certain periods, absorbed in himself. Thus God, considered in the evolution of His power, is nature. And nature, as attached to its immanent principle, is called God.[829] The fundamental doctrine of the Stoics was a spiritual, ideal, intellectual pantheism, of which the proper formula is, _All things are God, but God is not all things_. [Footnote 828: Or "matter." A good deal of misapprehension has arisen from confounding the intellectual yle of Aristotle and the Stoics with the gross physical "matter" of the modern physicist. By "matter" we now understand that which is corporeal, tangible, sensible; whereas by yle, Aristotle and the Stoics (who borrowed the term from him) understood that which is incorporeal, intangible, and inapprehensible to sense,--an "unknown something" which must necessarily be _supposed_ as the condition of the existence of things. The _formal_ cause of Aristotle is "the substance and essence"--the primary nature of things, on which all their properties depend. The _material_ cause is "the matter or subject" through which the primary nature manifests itself. Unfortunately the term "material" misleads the modern thinker. He is in danger of supposing the _hyle_ of Aristotle to be something sensible and physical, whereas it is an intellectual principle whose inherence is implied in any physical thing. It is something distinct from _body_, and has none of those properties we are now accustomed to ascribe to matter. Body, corporeity, is the result of the union of "hyle" and "form." Stobaeus thus expounds the doctrine of Aristotle: Form alone, separate from matter (yle) is _incorporeal_; so matter alone, separated from form, is not _body_. But there is need of the joint concurrence of both these--matter and form--to make the substance of body. Every individual substance is thus a totality of matter and form--a sinolon. The Stoics taught that God is _oneliness_ (Diogenes Laertius, "Lives of the Philosophers," bk. vii. ch. lxviii.); that he is _eternal_ and _immortal_ (bk. vii. ch. lxxii.); he could not, th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416  
417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

matter

 

Aristotle

 
Stoics
 

substance

 

nature

 

things

 
physical
 
called
 

intellectual

 

doctrine


modern
 
material
 
properties
 

primary

 

incorporeal

 

principle

 
corporeal
 

existence

 

distinct

 

analysis


corporeity

 

ascribe

 

accustomed

 

result

 

Unfortunately

 

manifests

 

subject

 

misleads

 

thinker

 

Stobaeus


inherence

 

supposing

 

danger

 

implied

 

expounds

 
Laertius
 
Philosophers
 

Diogenes

 

oneliness

 

sinolon


taught
 
regarded
 

immortal

 

eternal

 

lxviii

 

bstance

 
totality
 

individual

 
separated
 

separate