FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219  
220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   >>   >|  
bid., p. 28.] [Footnote 297: "Lectures on Metaphysics," vol. ii. pp. 368, 373.] [Footnote 298: Ibid., vol. ii. p. 373.] In attempting a brief criticism of "the Philosophy of the Conditioned," we may commence by inquiring: I. _What is the real import and significance of the doctrine "that all human knowledge is only of the relative or phenomenal_?" Hamilton calls this "the great axiom" of philosophy. That we may distinctly comprehend its meaning, and understand its bearing on the subject under discussion, we must ascertain the sense in which he uses the words "_phenomenal_" and "_relative._" The importance of an exact terminology is fully appreciated by our author; and accordingly, in three Lectures (VIII., IX., X.), he has given a full explication of the terms most commonly employed in philosophic discussions. Here the word "_phenomenon_" is set down as the necessary "_correlative_" of the word "_subject_" or "_substance_." "These terms can not be explained apart, for each is correlative of the other, each can be comprehended only in and through its correlative. The term '_subject_' is used to denote the unknown (?) basis which lies under the various _phenomena_ or properties of which we become aware, whether in our external or internal experience."[299] "The term '_relative_' is _opposed_ to the term '_absolute_;' therefore, in saying that we know only the relative, I virtually assert that we know nothing absolutely, that is, _in and for itself, and without relation to us and our faculties_."[300] Now, in the philosophy of Sir William Hamilton, "the absolute" is defined as "that which is aloof from relation"--"that which is out of all relation."[301] The _absolute_ can not, therefore, be "_the correlative_" of the conditioned--can not stand in any relation to the phenomenal. The _subject,_ however, is the necessary correlative of the phenomenal, and, consequently, the subject and the absolute are not identical. Furthermore, Hamilton tells us the subject _may be comprehended_ in and through its correlative--the phenomenon; but the absolute, being aloof from all relation, can not be comprehended or conceived at all. "The subject" and "the absolute" are, therefore, not synonymous terms; and, if they are not synonymous, then their antithetical terms, "phenomenal" and "relative," can not be synonymous. [Footnote 299: "Lectures on Metaphysics," vol. i. p. 148.] [Footnote 300: Ibid., vol. i. p. 137.] [Footnot
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219  
220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
subject
 

correlative

 

absolute

 
relation
 
phenomenal
 
relative
 

Footnote

 

Lectures

 

comprehended

 

synonymous


Hamilton
 
philosophy
 

Metaphysics

 

phenomenon

 

unknown

 

opposed

 

properties

 

phenomena

 

experience

 

internal


external
 

denote

 

defined

 
conceived
 

Furthermore

 
identical
 
Footnot
 

antithetical

 

faculties

 

absolutely


virtually

 

assert

 
conditioned
 
William
 

explication

 
knowledge
 

doctrine

 

import

 

significance

 

understand


bearing

 

meaning

 
comprehend
 

distinctly

 
attempting
 
commence
 

inquiring

 

Conditioned

 
Philosophy
 

criticism