FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>   >|  
tered Rome as a conqueror? Had he not placed his Gauls in the Senate?--Shakespeare, it may be said, has not brought these things forward--True;--and this is just the ground of my perplexity. What character did Shakespeare mean his Brutus to be? _Ib._ Speech of Brutus:-- "For if thou _path_, thy native semblance on." Surely, there need be no scruple in treating this "path" as a mere misprint or mis-script for "put." In what place does Shakespeare--where does any other writer of the same age--use "path" as a verb for "walk?" _Ib._ sc. 2. Caesar's speech:-- "She dreamt to-night, she saw my _statue_." No doubt, it should be _statua_, as in the same age, they more often pronounced "heroes" as a trisyllable than dissyllable. A modern tragic poet would have written,-- "Last night she dreamt that she my statue saw." But Shakespeare never avails himself of the supposed license of transposition, merely for the metre. There is always some logic either of thought or passion to justify it. Act iii. sc. 1. Antony's speech:-- "Pardon me, Julius--here wast thou bay'd, brave hart: Here didst thou fall; and here thy hunters stand Sign'd in thy spoil, and crimson'd in thy lethe. _O world! thou wast the forest to this hart,_ _And this, indeed, O world! the heart of thee._" I doubt the genuineness of the last two lines;--not because they are vile; but first, on account of the rhythm, which is not Shakespearian, but just the very tune of some old play, from which the actor might have interpolated them;--and secondly, because they interrupt, not only the sense and connection, but likewise the flow both of the passion, and (what is with me still more decisive) of the Shakespearian link of association. As with many another parenthesis or gloss slipt into the text, we have only to read the passage without it, to see that it never was in it. I venture to say there is no instance in Shakespeare fairly like this. Conceits he has; but they not only rise out of some word in the lines before, but also lead to the thought in the lines following. Here the conceit is a mere alien: Antony forgets an image, when he is even touching it, and then recollects it, when the thought last in his mind must have led him away from it. Act iv. sc. 3. Speech of Brutus:-- ... "What, shall one of us, That struck the foremost man of all this world, But for _supporting robbers_." This seemingly strange assertion of Brutus is unhap
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shakespeare

 
Brutus
 

thought

 

Shakespearian

 

statue

 

dreamt

 

speech

 

Antony

 
passion
 

Speech


parenthesis

 

association

 

decisive

 

venture

 

passage

 
account
 

rhythm

 

conqueror

 
connection
 

likewise


interrupt

 

interpolated

 

instance

 

struck

 
foremost
 

seemingly

 

strange

 

assertion

 

robbers

 

supporting


fairly

 

Conceits

 
conceit
 
touching
 

recollects

 

forgets

 

Senate

 

native

 

written

 

tragic


modern

 
dissyllable
 

license

 

transposition

 

supposed

 

avails

 

trisyllable

 

heroes

 
treating
 
scruple