FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   >>  
was true that the Jemtchug was caught unprepared. Her Captain was spending the night ashore, her decks were not cleared, she was slow to get into action, and when she did so her marksmanship was poor. All this could hardly be excused, but it becomes insignificant when we consider the case of the French torpedo boats and the D'Iberville, whose help the Jemtchug had a right to expect. Here they lay in a harbor with fully ten minutes' warning that a hostile ship was approaching, yet they allowed that ship to enter the harbor, steam around it, turn, and make her escape without so much as firing a shot, when, if they had gone into action, the Emden could hardly have escaped. The range was everything they could have desired. What was the matter? Why did they remain silent? The answer is this: Although it was a time of war, a large percentage of the officers of these ships had been allowed to remain ashore over night. Not one of the ships had steam up. Their decks were not even cleared for action. Yet, even taking this into consideration, it is inexplicable that, when two or three torpedoes from any one of them would have saved the day, none was fired. The ships need not have moved an inch to have done so. The range was ridiculously short--less than 200 yards at one time. But surprise, lack of discipline, and general inefficiency seemed to hold them paralyzed. The prevailing opinion here is that they did not wish to draw the Emden's fire on themselves--although one did use her machine gun toward the end of the engagement. Whatever is said, however, it is impossible to get away from the fact that the French Navy yesterday sustained a blow to its efficiency that it will take a long time to wipe out. Theirs was a "masterly inaction" caused by something which they do not attempt themselves to define. Both army and navy commanders here are one in their contemptuous condemnation of such a spectacle. The Belgian Soldier [From The London Times, Oct. 17, 1914. By its Special Correspondent lately in Antwerp.] Before it fades I would like to record my impression of the Belgian soldier as I have seen him day after day through the two months ending with the fall of Antwerp. I have seen him on every kind of duty and off, on the roads, in cabarets, in camp and barrack, on the march, in trenches, fighting from behind all sorts of cover or from none, on foot, on horseback, on bicycles, mounted proudly on his auto-mitraill
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265  
266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   >>  



Top keywords:

action

 
harbor
 

ashore

 
Antwerp
 
allowed
 

cleared

 

French

 

Belgian

 
Jemtchug
 
remain

caused
 

inaction

 

commanders

 

attempt

 

masterly

 

define

 

engagement

 

Whatever

 
machine
 
impossible

contemptuous

 

efficiency

 

yesterday

 

sustained

 

Theirs

 

cabarets

 
barrack
 
trenches
 

fighting

 
proudly

mounted

 
mitraill
 

bicycles

 
horseback
 
ending
 

months

 
Special
 

London

 

spectacle

 
Soldier

Correspondent

 

impression

 

soldier

 

record

 

Before

 

condemnation

 
escape
 

firing

 

hostile

 

approaching