FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>   >|  
more transferred it to imperial government. If _procurator_ is correct here, Pacarius must have been a subordinate imperial functionary in a senatorial province. As the province changed hands so often and was so soon after this placed under imperial control, it is possible that Tacitus made a mistake and that Pacarius was an ex-praetor. Those who feel that Tacitus is unlikely to have made this error, and that Pacarius can hardly have been anything but governor, adopt the suggestion that Corsica did not share the fate of Sardinia in A.D. 67, but remained under the control of an imperial procurator. There is no clear evidence of this, but under Diocletian Corsica was certainly separate. [247] These cruisers were of a peculiarly light build, called after the Liburni, an Illyrian tribe, who fought for Octavian in the battle of Actium. He introduced similar craft into the Roman navy. They were very fast, and worked with a triangular, instead of the usual square sail. [248] i.e. his Corsican and Roman clients. [249] i. 70. [250] Piacenza and Pavia. [251] i.e. one of the two detachments sent forward by the armies of Dalmatia and Pannonia (cp. chap. 11). [252] Otho's Praetorian Guards were the weakest point in his army. [253] Cp. i. 36 note 61. [254] i.e. that Spurinna was in league with Caecina, and meant to hand them over to him. [255] He was making 'a reconnaissance in force westwards along the river bank to discover, if he could, the strength and intentions of the enemy' (B.W. Henderson, _Civil War_, &c.). But Mr. E.G. Hardy points out that, as he had only 4,000 men and Caecina's 30,000 were in the immediate neighbourhood, this would have been foolish. It seems better to believe Tacitus' suggestion that his insubordinate troops forced Spurinna to march out. [256] Considered Gallic and effeminate. [257] Mr. Henderson (_Civil War_, &c.) argues that it was imperative for Caecina to take the fortress at Placentia, since it threatened his sole line of communication with Valens' column. Tacitus, as usual, gives a practical rather than a strategic motive. His interests are purely human
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

imperial

 
Tacitus
 

Pacarius

 

Caecina

 

control

 

procurator

 

province

 

Henderson

 

Spurinna

 

suggestion


Corsica

 

discover

 

intentions

 

strength

 

Praetorian

 

Guards

 

weakest

 

league

 

westwards

 

reconnaissance


making

 

threatened

 

communication

 

Valens

 

Placentia

 

imperative

 

fortress

 

column

 

interests

 

purely


motive

 

practical

 
strategic
 
argues
 

neighbourhood

 

points

 

foolish

 

Considered

 

Gallic

 

effeminate


forced

 

insubordinate

 

troops

 

Sardinia

 

governor

 

Diocletian

 

separate

 

evidence

 

remained

 
subordinate