FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   >>  
t of an opposing fleet doubled on, and separated from the main body. 'The French admiral, with his fleet, showed the greatest passive gallantry; and certainly the French Intrepide, with some others, evinced active courage equal to the British; but there was no nautical management, no skilful manoeuvring. 'It may appear presumptuous thus to have questioned the propriety of the Trafalgar attack; but it is only just, to point out the advantages and disadvantages of every means that may be used for the attainment of great results, that the probabilities and existing circumstances may be well weighed before such means are applied. A plan, to be entirely correct, must be suited to all cases. If its infallibility is not thus established, there can be no impropriety in pointing out the errors and dangers to which it is exposed, for the benefit of others. 'Our heroic and lamented chief knew his means, and the power he had to deal with; he also knew the means he adopted were sufficient for the occasion; and that sufficed. 'The Trafalgar attack might be followed under different circumstances, and have a different result: it is right, therefore, to discuss its merits and demerits. It cannot take one atom from the fame of the departed hero, whose life was one continued scene of original ability, and of superior action.' FOOTNOTE: [1] The concluding part of the MS. is devoted to a detailed account of the part played in the action by the Conqueror and her two seconds, Neptune and Leviathan, with the special purpose of showing that Villeneuve really struck to the Conqueror. In a note the author says, 'I have been thus particular, as the capture of the French admiral has been unblushingly attributed to others without any mention being made of the ship that actually was the principal in engaging her, wishing to do justice to a gallant officer who on that day considered his task not complete until every ship was either captured or beyond distance of pursuit.' The inference is that the author was an officer of the Conqueror, defending his captain, Israel Pellew, younger brother of the more famous Edward, Lord Exmouth. It is possible therefore, and even probable, that this criticism of Trafalgar represents the ideas of the Pellews. INDEX Additional Instructions, 113, 115, 126-8, 203-229 Admiral, station of, inline, 12, 15, 16, 22, 24, 61, 77, 88, 91, 100, 123, 127, 166, 243-5, 276, 317. _See also_ Flag, and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   >>  



Top keywords:
Trafalgar
 

Conqueror

 

French

 

circumstances

 

attack

 

author

 

admiral

 

action

 

officer

 
considered

justice

 

wishing

 

complete

 

principal

 

gallant

 

engaging

 

purpose

 
showing
 
Villeneuve
 
special

Leviathan

 

seconds

 

Neptune

 

struck

 

unblushingly

 

attributed

 

capture

 

mention

 
Exmouth
 

inline


station
 
Admiral
 

Instructions

 
Pellew
 
Israel
 
younger
 

brother

 

captain

 
defending
 
distance

pursuit
 

inference

 

famous

 
Edward
 
represents
 

Pellews

 

Additional

 

criticism

 

played

 

probable