FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>   >|  
ropositions are such that all their Terms are Species of the same Genus, and are also so related that two of them, taken together, yield a Conclusion, which, taken with another of them, yields another Conclusion, and so on, until all have been taken, it is evident that, if the original Set were true, the last Conclusion would _also_ be true. Such a Set, with the last Conclusion tacked on, is called a '=Sorites='; the original Set of Propositions is called its '=Premisses='; each of the intermediate Conclusions is called a '=Partial Conclusion=' of the Sorites; the last Conclusion is called its '=Complete Conclusion=,' or, more briefly, its '=Conclusion='; the Genus, of which all the Terms are Species, is called its '=Universe of Discourse=', or, more briefly, its '=Univ.='; the Terms, used as Eliminands in the Syllogisms, are called its '=Eliminands='; and the two Terms, which are retained, and therefore appear in the Conclusion, are called its '=Retinends='. [Note that each _Partial_ Conclusion contains one or two _Eliminands_; but that the _Complete_ Conclusion contains _Retinends_ only.] The Conclusion is said to be '=consequent=' from the Premisses; for which reason it is usual to prefix to it the word "Therefore" (or the symbol ".'."). [Note that the question, whether the Conclusion is or is not _consequent_ from the Premisses, is not affected by the _actual_ truth or falsity of any one of the Propositions which make up the Sorites, by depends entirely on their _relationship to one another_. pg086 As a specimen-Sorites, let us take the following Set of 5 Propositions:-- (1) "No a are b'; (2) All b are c; (3) All c are d; (4) No e' are a'; (5) All h are e'". Here the first and second, taken together, yield "No a are c'". This, taken along with the third, yields "No a are d'". This, taken along with the fourth, yields "No d' are e'". And this, taken along with the fifth, yields "All h are d". Hence, if the original Set were true, this would _also_ be true. Hence the original Set, with this tacked on, is a _Sorites_; the original Set is its _Premisses_; the Proposition "All h are d" is its _Conclusion_; the Terms a, b, c, e are its _Eliminands_; and the Terms d and h are its _Retinends_. Hence we may
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Conclusion

 

called

 
original
 

Sorites

 

yields

 

Eliminands

 

Premisses


Propositions

 

Retinends

 
consequent
 

briefly

 
Complete
 
tacked
 
Species

Partial
 

specimen

 

depends

 

relationship

 

Proposition

 

fourth

 

retained


Discourse

 

Universe

 

Conclusions

 

Syllogisms

 

intermediate

 

ropositions

 

related


evident
 

question

 

symbol

 

Therefore

 

affected

 

falsity

 
actual

prefix
 

reason