FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
--. (3) _Fallacy of two Entity-Premisses._ Here the given Pair may be represented by either (xm_{1} + ym_{1}) or (xm_{1} + ym'_{1}). These, set out on Triliteral Diagrams, are xm_{1} + ym_{1} xm_{1} + ym'_{1} .---------------. .---------------. | | | | | | | .---|---. | | .---|---. | | | (I) | | | | (I) | | |---|(I)|---|---| |(I)|---|---|---| | | | | | | | | | | | .---|---. | | .---|---. | | | | | | | .---------------. .---------------. pg084 Sec. 4. _Method of proceeding with a given Pair of Propositions._ Let us suppose that we have before us a Pair of Propositions of Relation, which contain between them a Pair of codivisional Classes, and that we wish to ascertain what Conclusion, if any, is consequent from them. We translate them, if necessary, into subscript-form, and then proceed as follows:-- (1) We examine their Subscripts, in order to see whether they are (a) a Pair of Nullities; or (b) a Nullity and an Entity; or (c) a Pair of Entities. (2) If they are a Pair of Nullities, we examine their Eliminands, in order to see whether they are Unlike or Like. If their Eliminands are _Unlike_, it is a case of Fig. I. We then examine their Retinends, to see whether one or both of them are asserted to _exist_. If one Retinend is so asserted, it is a case of Fig. I (a); if both, it is a case of Fig. I (b). If their Eliminands are Like, we examine them, in order to see whether either of them is asserted to exist. If so, it is a case of Fig. III.; if not, it is a case of "Fallacy of Like Eliminands not asserted to exist." (3) If they are a Nullity and an Entity, we examine their Eliminands, in order to see whether they are Like or Unlike. If their Eliminands are Like, it is a case of Fig. II.; if _Unlike_, it is a case of "Fallacy of Unlike Eliminands with an Entity-Premiss." (4) If they are a Pair of Entities, it is a case of "Fallacy of two Entity-Premisses." [Work Examples Sec. =4=, 1-11 (p. 100); Sec. =5=, 1-12 (p. 101); Sec. =6=, 7-12 (p. 106); Sec. =7=, 7-12 (p. 108).] pg085 BOOK VII. SORITESES. CHAPTER I. _INTRODUCTORY._ When a Set of three or more Biliteral P
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Eliminands

 

Entity

 
examine
 

Unlike

 

Fallacy

 

asserted

 
Premisses

Entities
 

Propositions

 
Nullity
 

Nullities

 
INTRODUCTORY
 

CHAPTER

 

Biliteral


Examples

 

Premiss

 

Retinends

 
Retinend
 

SORITESES

 
proceeding
 

Method


Diagrams

 

suppose

 

Relation

 

Triliteral

 

represented

 

subscript

 

translate


proceed

 
Subscripts
 
consequent
 

Classes

 

codivisional

 

ascertain

 

Conclusion