FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136  
137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   >>   >|  
seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America, the twelfth. In witness whereof, we have hereunto subscribed our names." [Followed by the signatures of "George Washington, President, and deputy from Virginia," and the other delegates who signed it.] This attachment to the instrument--a mere attestation of its authenticity, and of the fact that it had the unanimous consent _of all the States_ then present by their deputies--not _of all the deputies_, for some of them refused to sign it--has been strangely construed by some commentators as if it were a part of the Constitution, and implied that it was "done," in the sense of completion of the work.[34] But the work was not _done_ when the Convention closed its labors and adjourned. It was scarcely begun. There was no validity or binding force whatever in what had been already "done." It was still to be submitted to the States for approval or rejection. Even if a majority of eight out of thirteen States had ratified it, the refusal of the ninth would have rendered it null and void. Mr. Madison, who was one of the most distinguished of its authors and signers, writing after it was completed and signed, but before it was ratified, said: "It is time now to recollect that the powers [of the Convention] were merely advisory and recommendatory; that they were so meant by the States, and so understood by the Convention; and that the latter have accordingly planned and proposed a Constitution, which is to be of no more consequence than the paper on which it is written, unless it be stamped with the approbation of those to whom it is addressed."--("Federalist," No. XL.) The mode and terms in which this approval was expressed will be considered in the next chapter. [Footnote 31: Constitution, Article V.] [Footnote 32: See Elliott's "Debates," vol. v, p. 214. This reference is taken from "The Republic of Republics," Part III, chapter vii, p. 217. This learned, exhaustive, and admirable work, which contains a wealth of historical and political learning, will be freely used, by kind consent of the author, without the obligation of a repetition of special acknowledgment in every case. A like liberty will be taken with the late Dr. Bledsoe's masterly treatise on the right of secession, published in 1866, under the title, "Is Davis a Traitor? or, Was Secession a Constitutional Right?"] [Footnote 33: No. xliii.] [Footnote 34: See "Republic of Repu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136  
137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 

Footnote

 

Convention

 

Constitution

 

approval

 
chapter
 
deputies
 

consent

 
ratified
 

signed


Republic

 

Debates

 
Elliott
 

written

 
stamped
 

consequence

 
planned
 
proposed
 

approbation

 

expressed


considered

 

addressed

 

Federalist

 

Article

 

admirable

 

treatise

 

secession

 

published

 

masterly

 

Bledsoe


liberty

 
Constitutional
 

Secession

 

Traitor

 

understood

 
exhaustive
 

wealth

 
historical
 

learned

 
Republics

political
 

learning

 
repetition
 
special
 

acknowledgment

 

obligation

 
freely
 

author

 
reference
 

present