FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153  
154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   >>   >|  
of the debate, attacked it vehemently. He said, speaking of the system of government set forth in the proposed Constitution: "That this is a consolidated government is demonstrably clear; and the danger of such a government is, to my mind, very striking. I have the highest veneration for those gentlemen [its authors]; but, sir, give me leave to demand, What right had they to say, _We, the people_? My political curiosity, exclusive of my anxious solicitude for the public welfare, leads me to ask, Who authorized them to speak the language of '_We, the people_,' instead of _We, the States_? States are the characteristics and the soul of a confederation. If the States be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great consolidated national government of the people of all the States."[38] Again, on the next day, with reference to the same subject, he said: "When I asked that question, I thought the meaning of my interrogation was obvious. The fate of this question and of America may depend on this. Have they said, We, the States? Have they made a proposal of a compact between States? If they had, this would be a confederation: it is otherwise most clearly a consolidated government. The question turns, sir, on that poor little thing--the expression, 'We, the people,' instead of the States of America."[39] The same difficulty arose in other minds and in other conventions. The scruples of Mr. Adams were removed by the explanations of others, and by the assurance of the adoption of the amendments thought necessary--especially of that declaratory safeguard afterward embodied in the tenth amendment--to be referred to hereafter. Mr. Henry's objection was thus answered by Mr. Madison: "Who are parties to it [the Constitution]? The people--but _not the people as composing one great body_; but the people as composing _thirteen sovereignties_: were it, as the gentleman [Mr. Henry] asserts, a consolidated government, the assent of a majority of the people would be sufficient for its establishment, and as a majority have adopted it already, the remaining States would be bound by the act of the majority, even if they unanimously reprobated it: were it such a government as is suggested, it would be now binding on the people of this State, without having had the privilege of deliberating upon it; but, sir, no State is bound by it, as it
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153  
154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
people
 

States

 

government

 

consolidated

 

majority

 
question
 
confederation
 

composing

 
America
 

compact


thought

 

Constitution

 
afterward
 

safeguard

 
embodied
 

declaratory

 
referred
 
objection
 

system

 

amendment


amendments

 

conventions

 

scruples

 

proposed

 

difficulty

 

assurance

 

adoption

 

answered

 

explanations

 

removed


Madison

 
reprobated
 

suggested

 

unanimously

 

binding

 
debate
 

deliberating

 
privilege
 

attacked

 
remaining

thirteen
 

sovereignties

 
parties
 
speaking
 

gentleman

 

asserts

 
adopted
 

establishment

 
sufficient
 

assent