FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  
en palaeographers like Sir Frederic Madden, Sir Francis Palgrave, and Mr. Duffus Hardy, tell us that a manuscript, professing to be ancient and original, is a modern fabrication, we submit at once. A judgment pronounced by such experts commands the unquestioning deference of laymen; unless, indeed, the doctors differ; and then the humblest and most ignorant of us all must endeavor to decide between them. And when a court, under extraordinary circumstances,--and those of the present case are very extraordinary,-- not only pronounces judgment, but feels compelled to assign the reasons for that judgment, thinking men who are interested in the question under consideration will examine the evidence and weigh the arguments for themselves. In the present case reasons have been given by Sir Frederic Madden, Mr. Hardy, and Dr. Ingleby, the chief-justice and two puisne judges of our court. The first says, (in his letter of March 24th, 1860, to the London "Critic,") that, on examining the folio with Mr. Bond, the Assistant Keeper of his Department, they were both "struck with the very suspicious character of the writing,"--certainly the work of one hand, but presenting varieties of forms assignable to different periods,--the evident painting of the letters, and the artificial look of the ink. Mr. Hardy speaks more explicitly to the same purpose; and we must quote him at some length. He says,-- "The handwriting of the notes and alterations in the Devonshire folio [Mr. Collier's] is of a mixed character, varying even in the same page, from the stiff, labored Gothic hand of the sixteenth century to the round text-hand of the nineteenth, a fact most perceptible in the capital letters. It bears unequivocal marks also of laborious imitation throughout. "In their broader characteristics, the features of the handwriting of this country, from the time of the Reformation, may be arranged under four epochs, sufficiently distinct to elucidate our argument:-- "1. The stiff upright Gothic of Henry VIII. and Edward VI. "2. The same, inclining and less stiff, as a greater amount of correspondence demanded an easier style of writing, under Elizabeth. "3. The cursive, based on an Italian model, (the Gothic becoming more flexible and now rapidly disappearing,) in the reign of James I., and continuing in use for about a century. "4. The round hand of the schoolmaster, under the House of Hanover, degenerating into the careless, half-f
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

judgment

 

Gothic

 

reasons

 

extraordinary

 

present

 
character
 

writing

 

handwriting

 

letters

 

century


Frederic
 

Madden

 

schoolmaster

 

sixteenth

 

nineteenth

 

perceptible

 

unequivocal

 
labored
 

continuing

 

capital


length

 

purpose

 

explicitly

 

careless

 

alterations

 

varying

 
laborious
 
Hanover
 

Devonshire

 
Collier

degenerating

 

Italian

 

Edward

 
rapidly
 

flexible

 

inclining

 

cursive

 

easier

 
demanded
 

correspondence


greater

 

amount

 

upright

 

country

 

Reformation

 

features

 
characteristics
 
Elizabeth
 

broader

 

arranged