FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572  
573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   >>  
een, three hundred and eighty. But the Persians were infinitely more numerously manned, having on board of each vessel thirty men-at-arms, in addition to the usual number of two hundred. Plutarch seems to state the whole number in each Athenian vessel to be fourteen heavy armed and four bowmen. But this would make the whole Athenian force only three thousand two hundred and forty men, including the bowmen, who were probably not Athenian citizens. It must therefore be supposed, with Mr. Thirlwall, that the eighteen men thus specified were an addition to the ordinary company. [84] Aeschylus. Persae. 397. [85] The Persian admiral at Salamis is asserted by Ctesias to have been Onaphas, father-in-law to Xerxes. According to Herodotus, it was Ariabignes, the king's brother, who seems the same as Artabazanes, with whom he had disputed the throne.--Comp. Herod., lib. vii., c. 2, and lib. viii., c. 89. [86] Plut in vit. Them. [87] Plut. in vit. Them. The Ariamenes of Plutarch is the Ariabignes of Herodotus. [88] Mr. Mitford, neglecting to observe this error of Xerxes, especially noted by Herodotus, merely observes--"According to Herodotus, though in this instance we may have difficulty to give him entire credit, Xerxes, from the shore where he sat, saw, admired, and applauded the exploit." From this passage one would suppose that Xerxes knew it was a friend who had been attacked, and then, indeed, we could not have credited the account; but if he and those about him supposed it, as Herodotus states, a foe, what is there incredible? This is one instance in ten thousand more important ones, of Mr. Mitford's habit of arguing upon one sentence by omitting those that follow and precede it. [89] Diod., lib xi., c. 5. Herod., lib. viii., c. 110. Nepos, et Plut, in vit. Them. [90] Plut. in vit. Them. [91] Ibid. These anecdotes have the stamp of authenticity. [92] Herod., lib. viii., c. 125. See Wesseling's Comment on Timodemus. Plutarch tells the same anecdote, but makes the baffled rebuker of Themistocles a citizen of Seriphus, an island in which, according to Aelian, the frogs never croaked; the men seem to have made up for the silence of the frogs! [93] See Fast. Hell., vol. ii., page 26. [94] Plut. in vit. Arist. [95] Ibid. [96] The custom of lapidation was common to the earlier ages; it had a kind of sanction, too, in particular offences; and no crime could be considered by
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572  
573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   >>  



Top keywords:
Herodotus
 

Xerxes

 

Athenian

 

hundred

 

Plutarch

 

addition

 
According
 

supposed

 

Mitford

 

instance


number

 

bowmen

 

thousand

 

vessel

 

Ariabignes

 

credited

 

account

 

anecdotes

 

arguing

 
important

incredible
 
sentence
 
omitting
 

states

 

follow

 
precede
 

Themistocles

 
custom
 

lapidation

 
common

offences

 
considered
 
earlier
 

sanction

 
silence
 
anecdote
 

baffled

 
rebuker
 

Timodemus

 

Wesseling


Comment

 
citizen
 

Seriphus

 

croaked

 

island

 

Aelian

 
authenticity
 
neglecting
 

eighteen

 
ordinary