FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218  
219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   >>  
d drums and the tread of his marching hosts. What do we care for grammar when we think of those thunderous phrases, "Unconditional and immediate surrender," "I propose to move immediately upon your works," "I propose to fight it out on this line if it takes all summer." Mr. Arnold would doubtless claim that that last phrase is not strictly grammatical, and yet it did certainly wake up this nation as a hundred million tons of A-number-one fourth-proof, hard-boiled, hide-bound grammar from another mouth could not have done. And finally we have that gentler phrase, that one which shows you another true side of the man, shows you that in his soldier heart there was room for other than gory war mottoes and in his tongue the gift to fitly phrase them: "Let us have peace." APPENDIX R PARTY ALLEGIANCE. BEING A PORTION OF A PAPER ON "CONSISTENCY," READ BEFORE THE MONDAY EVENING CLUB IN 1887. (See Chapter clxiii) . . . I have referred to the fact that when a man retires from his political party he is a traitor--that he is so pronounced in plain language. That is bold; so bold as to deceive many into the fancy that it is true. Desertion, treason--these are the terms applied. Their military form reveals the thought in the man's mind who uses them: to him a political party is an army. Well, is it? Are the two things identical? Do they even resemble each other? Necessarily a political party is not an army of conscripts, for they are in the ranks by compulsion. Then it must be a regular army or an army of volunteers. Is it a regular army? No, for these enlist for a specified and well-understood term, and can retire without reproach when the term is up. Is it an army of volunteers who have enlisted for the war, and may righteously be shot if they leave before the war is finished? No, it is not even an army in that sense. Those fine military terms are high-sounding, empty lies, and are no more rationally applicable to a political party than they would be to an oyster-bed. The volunteer soldier comes to the recruiting office and strips himself and proves that he is so many feet high, and has sufficiently good teeth, and no fingers gone, and is sufficiently sound in body generally; he is accepted; but not until he has sworn a deep oath or made other solemn form of promise to march under, that flag until that war is done or his term of enlistment completed. What is the process when a voter joins a party? Must he prove tha
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218  
219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   >>  



Top keywords:

political

 

phrase

 

regular

 

military

 

volunteers

 

soldier

 
sufficiently
 
grammar
 

propose

 

things


resemble

 

identical

 

solemn

 

conscripts

 

compulsion

 

Necessarily

 

reveals

 

thought

 

process

 
completed

promise

 

enlistment

 

accepted

 

proves

 

sounding

 

recruiting

 

oyster

 

applicable

 
strips
 

rationally


office

 

finished

 

retire

 

generally

 

understood

 
volunteer
 

reproach

 

fingers

 

enlisted

 

righteously


enlist

 
grammatical
 

strictly

 

Arnold

 

doubtless

 

nation

 
hundred
 

boiled

 

million

 
number