FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439  
440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   >>  
ing another. Mankind will ever set new tasks to itself, and the accomplishment of the same will lead it to such a degree of social development that wars, religious quarrels and similar manifestations of barbarism will be unknown. FOOTNOTE: [228] "National and human interests stand to-day opposed to each other. At a higher stage of civilization these interests will coincide and become one."--v. Thuenen, "Der Isolirte Staat." PART V POPULATION _and_ OVER-POPULATION POPULATION AND OVER-POPULATION It has become quite fashionable with people who occupy themselves with the social question to consider the question of population as the most important and burning of all. They claim that we are threatened with "over-population;" aye, that the danger is upon us. This, more than any other division of the Social Question, must be treated from an international standpoint. The feeding and the distribution of the people have pre-eminently become international issues of fact. Since Malthus, the law underlying the increase of population has been the subject of extensive dispute. In his celebrated and now notorious "Essay on the Principles of Population," which Marx has characterized as a "school-boyish, superficial and pulpiteer piece of declamatory plagiarism on Sir James Stewart, Townsend, Franklin, Wallace and others" and which "contains not one original sentence," Malthus lays down the proposition that mankind has the tendency to increase in geometric progression (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, etc.), while food could increase only in arithmetic progression (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.); and that the consequence is a rapid disproportion between the numbers of the population and the supply of food, that inevitably leads to want and starvation. The final conclusion was the necessity of "abstinence" in the procreation of children, and abstinence from marriage without sufficient means for the support of a family, contrariwise there would be no place at "the banquet table of Nature" for the descendants. The fear of over-population is very old. It was touched upon in this work in connection with the social conditions of the Greeks and Romans, and at the close of the Middle Ages. Plato and Aristotle, the Romans, the small bourgeois of the Middle Ages were all swayed by it, and it even swayed Voltaire, who, in the first quarter of the eighteenth century, published a treatise on the subject. The fear ever turns up again--this circu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439  
440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   >>  



Top keywords:

population

 

POPULATION

 

social

 
increase
 

people

 
question
 

subject

 
progression
 

international

 
Malthus

abstinence

 
interests
 
Middle
 
swayed
 

Romans

 
quarter
 

century

 

Stewart

 

eighteenth

 
Voltaire

consequence

 

arithmetic

 
published
 

treatise

 

sentence

 

original

 

proposition

 

mankind

 

Franklin

 

Townsend


geometric

 

Wallace

 

tendency

 
supply
 

family

 

connection

 
contrariwise
 

support

 
conditions
 

Greeks


Nature

 
banquet
 

touched

 
sufficient
 

bourgeois

 

starvation

 
inevitably
 

numbers

 

descendants

 

children