FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635  
636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   >>   >|  
ed by idiosyncrasy of mental constitution. The contradictions of, or rather _among_, ideas and beliefs, with which we are now concerned, are more extensive and more varied than mere logical duels; they are also less definite, less precise. In reality they are culture conflicts in which the opposing forces, so far from being specific ideas only or pristine beliefs only, are in fact more or less bewildering complexes of ideas, beliefs, prejudices, sympathies, antipathies, and personal interests. It is assumed also, I suppose, that any idea or group of ideas, any belief or group of beliefs, may happen to be or may become a common interest, shared by a small or a large number of individuals. It may draw and hold them together in bonds of acquaintance, of association, even of co-operation. It thus may play a group-making role. Contradictory ideas or beliefs, therefore, may play a group-making role in a double sense. Each draws into association the individual minds that entertain it or find it attractive. Each also repels those minds to whom it is repugnant, and drives them toward the group which is being formed about the contradictory idea or belief. Contradictions among ideas and beliefs, then, it may be assumed, tend on the whole to sharpen the lines of demarcation between group and group. These assumptions are, I suppose, so fully justified by the everyday observation of mankind and so confirmed by history that it is unnecessary now to discuss them or in any way to dwell upon them. The question before us therefore becomes specific: "Are contradictions among ideas and beliefs likely to play an _important_ group-making role in the future?" I shall interpret the word important as connoting quality as well as quantity. I shall, in fact, attempt to answer the question set for me by translating it into this inquiry, namely: What kind or type of groups are the inevitable contradictions among ideas and beliefs most likely to create and to maintain within the progressive populations of the world from this time forth? Somewhat more than three hundred years ago, Protestantism and geographical discovery had combined to create conditions extraordinarily favorable to the formation of groups or associations about various conflicting ideas and beliefs functioning as nuclei; and for nearly three hundred years the world has been observing a remarkable multiplication of culture groups of two fundamentally different types. One type is
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   611   612   613   614   615   616   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635  
636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

beliefs

 

making

 

contradictions

 
groups
 
association
 

hundred

 
suppose
 

assumed

 

question

 

specific


create
 

culture

 

belief

 

important

 

translating

 
attempt
 

answer

 

discuss

 

confirmed

 
history

unnecessary

 
connoting
 

quality

 

interpret

 

future

 

quantity

 

Somewhat

 
functioning
 

nuclei

 

conflicting


favorable

 

formation

 

associations

 

fundamentally

 

observing

 

remarkable

 

multiplication

 

extraordinarily

 

conditions

 

maintain


progressive

 

inevitable

 

populations

 

discovery

 

combined

 

geographical

 
Protestantism
 

mankind

 

inquiry

 

drives