FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329  
330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   >>   >|  
sumption that it would be followed by an act of injustice. Mrs. STANTON replied she demanded the ballot for all. She asked for reconstruction on the basis of self-government; but if we are to have further class legislation, she thought the wisest order of enfranchisement was to take the educated classes first. If women are still to be represented by men, then I say let only the highest type of manhood stand at the helm of State. But if all men are to vote, black and white, lettered and unlettered, washed and unwashed, the safety of the nation as well as the interests of woman demand that we outweigh this incoming tide of ignorance, poverty, and vice, with the virtue, wealth, and education of the women of the country. With the black man you have no new force in government--it is manhood still; but with the enfranchisement of woman, you have a new and essential element of life and power. Would Horace Greeley, Wendell Phillips, Gerrit Smith, or Theodore Tilton be willing to stand aside and trust their individual interests, and the whole welfare of the nation, to the lowest strata of manhood? If not, why ask educated women, who love their country, who desire to mould its institutions on the highest idea of justice and equality, who feel that their enfranchisement is of vital importance to this end, why ask them to stand aside while 2,000,000 ignorant men are ushered into the halls of legislation? EDWARD M. DAVIS asked what had been done with Mr. Burleigh's amendment. The CHAIR--No action was taken upon it, as no one seconded it. ABBY KELLY FOSTER said: I am in New York for medical treatment, not for speech-making; yet I must say a few words in relation to a remark recently made on this platform--that "The negro should not enter the kingdom of politics before woman, because he would be an additional weight against her enfranchisement." Were the negro and woman in the same civil, social, and religious status to-day, I should respond aye, with all my heart, to this sentiment. What are the facts? You say the negro has the civil rights bill, also the military reconstruction bill granting him suffrage. It has been well said, "he has the title deed to liberty, but is not yet in the possession of liberty." He is treated as a slave to-day in t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329  
330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

enfranchisement

 

manhood

 
highest
 

interests

 

country

 

nation

 

legislation

 

reconstruction

 

government

 

educated


liberty

 
medical
 
EDWARD
 

making

 
speech
 
treatment
 

amendment

 

action

 

Burleigh

 

seconded


FOSTER

 

rights

 

military

 

sentiment

 

granting

 

treated

 

possession

 

suffrage

 

respond

 
kingdom

politics

 

platform

 
relation
 

remark

 

recently

 
additional
 

social

 
religious
 

status

 
weight

ushered

 

lettered

 

unlettered

 
incoming
 

ignorance

 

poverty

 
outweigh
 

demand

 

washed

 
unwashed