FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   >>  
tes of America, in consideration of the premises, divers other good and sufficient reasons me thereunto moving, do hereby grant to the said Beverly W. Jones, Edwin T. Marsh, and William B. Hall, a full and unconditional pardon. _In testimony whereof_, I have hereunto signed my name and caused the Seal of the United States to be affixed. [SEAL.] Done at the City of Washington, this Third day of March, A.D. 1874, and of the Independence of the United States the Ninety-eighth. By the President. U. S. GRANT. HAMILTON FISH, Secretary of State. CORRESPONDENCE FROM WASHINGTON--SPECIAL TO THE _COMMONWEALTH_. WASHINGTON, _April 14, 1874_. SUSAN ANTHONY'S CASE. Speaking of women, reminds me that a report will soon be made by the Judiciary Committee upon the petition of Susan B. Anthony for a remission of her fine for voting in the last Presidential campaign for General Grant and Henry Wilson. The friends of woman's suffrage confidently expect a favorable report upon this subject from the committee. It was a clear case of a decision by a judge in excess of his authority, and acting without warrant of law. It will not be a decision if favorably made into which the right of suffrage will necessarily enter. Miss Anthony claims her conviction was unconstitutional under the law, the judge having refused her the right of trial by jury in that he directed the jury to bring in a verdict of guilty. She insists that this proceeding of the judge was in derogation of her legal right of trial by jury, and as by law she had no appeal in a criminal case from the decision of a single judge, that it is the duty, as it is in the power, of Congress to remit the fine which she has been ordered to pay with the costs. This simply involves a legal question, and one which the Judiciary Committee will be quite likely to decide in Susan's favor as she has both law and precedent on her side. If the committee report favorably to the House, it will be quite likely to pass on its merits as a legal question, giving many members an opportunity to vote as their sympathies would direct without committing themselves squarely to the question of woman's suffrage. It is a step that will pave the way to this in the future. Mr. Sargent has introduced a similar bill in the Senate, and Senator Carpenter is pledged not only to its support but announce
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1465   1466   1467   1468   1469   1470   1471   1472   1473   1474   1475   1476   1477   1478   1479   >>  



Top keywords:
question
 

suffrage

 

report

 

decision

 
Committee
 

States

 

favorably

 

Judiciary

 

United

 
committee

WASHINGTON

 
Anthony
 

derogation

 

proceeding

 

guilty

 

insists

 
claims
 
necessarily
 

conviction

 
unconstitutional

directed

 

refused

 

verdict

 

squarely

 
committing
 

direct

 

opportunity

 

sympathies

 

future

 

pledged


support

 

announce

 

Carpenter

 

Senator

 

introduced

 

Sargent

 
similar
 

Senate

 

members

 

ordered


warrant

 

single

 

criminal

 

Congress

 

simply

 
involves
 

merits

 
giving
 

decide

 

precedent