FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   1415   1416   1417   1418  
1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441   1442   1443   >>   >|  
c law. With undiminished hope and faith, yours, CAROLINE M. SEVERANCE. HARTFORD, _April 22, 1866_. DEAR MADAM:--I learn by a circular I have received that a Woman's Rights Convention is to be held in New York in May. I can not have the pleasure of attending it, but I would like to take this opportunity of telling you I am with you, heart and soul, in this cause--of thanking you, and those with whom you are associated, for the noble work you have done, and are doing, in the cause of universal suffrage. There never was a more opportune time for calling a convention of this kind than the present, when it is evident that the United States Constitution is about to undergo some repairs--when all the so-called radicals in Congress are trying to have it so altered as to insure the disfranchisement of one-half the nation. They have so strangely perverted the meaning of the term "universal suffrage," that it is a misnomer as at present used by them. It is rather significant of the "universality" of the suffrage intended, that every one of these special guardians of freedom refused to present Congress a petition for woman's enfranchisement; that the Massachusetts Senator who leads the van of freedom's host, did, finally, most reluctantly present it with one hand, while taking good care to deal it a blow with the other that would prove a most effectual quietus to it; that a representative [Mr. Boutwell], after repeating the self-evident truth that "there can be no just government without the consent of the governed," says that "man is endowed by nature with the priority of right to the vote rather than woman or child;" that the two Senators from Massachusetts have each proposed amendments to the Constitution holding out inducements to the States to enfranchise all male inhabitants, but none to enfranchise women, when they could have included them by omitting one word; that that light of freedom, Mr. Greeley, of the _Tribune_, states that "men express the public sense as fully as if women voted" [speech in Suffield, Conn., last June]. These are a few of the straws pointing to that sham labeled "universal suffrage." The conservatives of the slave-driving school have had an odious enough reputation, but I never heard of any of them taking measures to so amend the Constitution as to insure the perpetuation of the disfranchisement of six
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1394   1395   1396   1397   1398   1399   1400   1401   1402   1403   1404   1405   1406   1407   1408   1409   1410   1411   1412   1413   1414   1415   1416   1417   1418  
1419   1420   1421   1422   1423   1424   1425   1426   1427   1428   1429   1430   1431   1432   1433   1434   1435   1436   1437   1438   1439   1440   1441   1442   1443   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
present
 

suffrage

 

freedom

 

universal

 
Constitution
 

evident

 

Massachusetts

 

taking

 

disfranchisement

 
insure

States

 
Congress
 

enfranchise

 

governed

 

consent

 

reputation

 
government
 
endowed
 

school

 
driving

nature

 

priority

 

odious

 

perpetuation

 
effectual
 

Boutwell

 

repeating

 

measures

 

quietus

 

representative


omitting

 

Suffield

 

included

 

Greeley

 

express

 

public

 
Tribune
 

states

 

speech

 

labeled


proposed

 

Senators

 

conservatives

 

pointing

 

inducements

 
inhabitants
 

holding

 
straws
 

amendments

 

opportunity