FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839  
840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   >>   >|  
from conferring the right of suffrage. (Scott _vs._ Sandford, 19 Howard, 422.) The right of suffrage is the right to choose officers of the Government, and it does not carry along the right of citizenship. (Bates on Citizenship, 4, 5.) Our laws make no provision for the loss or deprivation of citizenship. (_Id._) The word "citizen" is not mentioned in this clause, and its idea is excluded in the qualifications for suffrage in all the State constitutions. (_Id._, 5, 6.) Mr. SARGENT.--What clause is he commenting on? Mr. MERRIMON.--He is commenting on section 2 of article 1. He says further: American citizenship does not necessarily depend upon nor co-exist with the legal capacity to hold office or the right of suffrage, either or both of them. No person in the United States did ever exercise the right of suffrage in virtue of the naked, unassisted fact of citizenship. (_Id._) There is a distinction between political rights and political powers. The former belong to all citizens alike, and cohere in the very name and nature of citizenship. The latter (voting and holding office) does not belong to all citizens alike, nor to any citizen merely in virtue of citizenship. His power always depends upon extraneous facts and superadded qualifications; which facts and qualifications are common to both citizens and aliens. (Bates on Citizenship.) I read these hasty citations of authority which happen to be convenient to show that there is a distinction between political power and political rights, and in further support of the distinction between citizenship, or civil rights, and political rights. Mr. SARGENT.--Will my friend allow me a moment? Mr. MERRIMON.--Yes, sir. Mr. SARGENT.--The author there is commenting on the second section of the first article of the Constitution, and I think his reasoning on that upon general principles may be correct, at any rate it is in consonance with the authority that he cites. But it will be observed that by the XIV. article, section 1, it is provided that-- All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subjec
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   836   837   838   839  
840   841   842   843   844   845   846   847   848   849   850   851   852   853   854   855   856   857   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

citizenship

 

suffrage

 

political

 

rights

 

qualifications

 
SARGENT
 

commenting

 

article

 
section
 
distinction

citizens

 
MERRIMON
 
authority
 
States
 

virtue

 

belong

 
office
 

United

 

clause

 

citizen


Citizenship

 
convenient
 

conferring

 

friend

 

support

 

superadded

 

Howard

 
depends
 

extraneous

 

common


aliens

 
citations
 

Sandford

 
happen
 
observed
 
consonance
 

provided

 

naturalized

 

subjec

 

persons


Constitution

 
author
 

correct

 

principles

 

general

 

reasoning

 

moment

 

choose

 

provision

 

depend