FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62  
63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>   >|  
been already dramatized by Richard Edwardes. More certainly direct is his knowledge of Chaucer's _Troilus_, which, with Caxton's _Recuyell of the Historyes of Troye_, is the main source of _Troilus and Cressida_. The references to the leprosy of Cressida are due to Henryson's _Testament of Creseide_, a Scots sequel to Chaucer's poem, printed in the sixteenth century editions of the older poet's works. In the _Legend of Good Women_ he may have found the story of Pyramus, and a version of the tragedy of Lucrece, to supplement his main sources in Livy and Ovid. Chaucer's contemporary Gower contributed to his stock the story of Florent (_Taming of the Shrew_, I. ii. 69) from the _Confessio Amantis_, and from the same collection a version of the tale of _Apollonius of Tyre_, dramatized by Shakespeare and another in _Pericles_. [Page Heading: Contemporary Literature] With the non-dramatic literature produced by Shakespeare's contemporaries, we naturally find most evidence of his acquaintance in the case of those books which provided material for his plays. Thus the otherwise obscure Arthur Brooke, whose poem _Romeus and Juliet_ is the chief source of the tragedy, is much more prominent in such an enumeration as the present than he probably was in Shakespeare's view of the literature of the day. Painter, whose version of the same story in his _Palace of Pleasure_ cannot be shown to have been used much, if at all, by the dramatist, seems nevertheless to have been known to him; and we hardly need evidence that Shakespeare must have kept a watchful eye on similar collections of stories, such as Whetstone's, Riche's, and Pettie's. Of the greater writers of imaginative literature there is none missing from the list of those he knew, though, as has been implied, the evidence is not always proportionate to the greatness; and some prominent figures in other fields, such as Hooker and Bacon, do not appear. Spenser, who is supposed to have alluded to Shakespeare in _Colin Clout's come home again_ and, less probably, in _The Teares of the Muses_, is in turn alluded to in _A Midsummer-Night's Dream_, V. i. 52; and his version of the story of Lear in _The Faerie Queene_, II. x, is believed to have given Shakespeare his form of the name Cordelia. Evidence is more abundant in the case of Sir Philip Sidney. The under-plot of _King Lear_ is based on the story of the blind king of Paphlagonia in the _Arcadia_, and Sidney's sonnets, along wi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62  
63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Shakespeare
 

version

 

literature

 

evidence

 
Chaucer
 
tragedy
 

alluded

 
Cressida
 

source

 

Sidney


Troilus

 

prominent

 
dramatized
 

writers

 
dramatist
 
imaginative
 

implied

 

missing

 
greater
 

Pettie


watchful

 

proportionate

 

similar

 
collections
 

stories

 
Whetstone
 

Cordelia

 

Evidence

 

abundant

 

believed


Faerie

 

Queene

 
Philip
 

Arcadia

 

Paphlagonia

 

sonnets

 
Spenser
 
supposed
 

Hooker

 

figures


fields

 

Midsummer

 

Teares

 

greatness

 
Brooke
 

Legend

 
editions
 

Pyramus

 
Lucrece
 

contributed