FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  
trade is disparaged in its importance, what becomes of this arithmetical illustration of the superiority of foreign trade, when by the same standard we come to measure it against the home trade, scarcely less a subject of depreciation and vituperation than the colonial, with thinkers of the same impenetrable, if not profound class as the member for Stockport? Here, for his edification, we consign the resulting figures from the standard set up by himself, as they may be found calculated and resolved from minute detail into grand totals in the "General Statistics of the British Empire," by Mr James Macqueen, an authority, perhaps, who will not be questioned by competent judges any where without the pale of the Draconian legislators of the Anti-corn-Law League. "The yearly consumption of the population of Great Britain and Ireland for food, clothing, and lodging, (we give the round numbers only):-- Agricultural produce for food, L.295,479,000 Produce of manufactures, 262,085,000 Imports, (raw produce, &c.) value as landed, 55,000,000 ------------- 612,564,000 Deduct exports, 51,000,000 ------------- L.561,564,000" It follows, then, that whilst foreign trade simply consumes something more than double that of colonial trade, the home trade alone amounts to eleven times over both foreign and colonial together, and by sixteen times as much the amount of foreign trade alone. Upon the hypothesis of Mr Cobden, therefore, foreign trade should be treated as of no value at all in the national sense. Having disposed of Mr Cobden according to Cocker, in reference to his arithmetical demonstrations of the superiority in point of pounds, shillings, and pence value of one sort of trade over another, we may notice some petty trickery, cunningly intended on his part, consisting in the suppression of figures and facts on the one side, and their aggregation on the other, &c., by way of bolstering up unfairly a rotten case. He states the whole colonial trade at L.16,000,000 only, inclusive of British India, whereas Porter's Tables, which he must have consulted, give the _total_ exports of Great Britain to all the world for 1840, at
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   >>  



Top keywords:

foreign

 

colonial

 
Cobden
 

Britain

 
figures
 

superiority

 

standard

 
arithmetical
 

exports

 

British


produce

 

amount

 

Having

 
national
 

treated

 

hypothesis

 
double
 

whilst

 

simply

 

consumes


eleven
 

amounts

 
disposed
 
sixteen
 

trickery

 
inclusive
 

states

 

bolstering

 

unfairly

 

rotten


Porter

 

consulted

 

Tables

 
notice
 

shillings

 

pounds

 

Cocker

 

reference

 

demonstrations

 

aggregation


suppression

 

consisting

 
Deduct
 

cunningly

 

intended

 

edification

 

consign

 

resulting

 

Stockport

 
member