FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  
ks very tickle of that sere: a yawn might come much more easily. The most shocking thing that the heroine, who is "an attempt to delineate woman in her natural state," does (and that not of malice) is to receive her lover in a natural bathroom. But her adventures are told in a style which is the oddest compound of Romantesque and Johnsonese. ("The hour was ardent. The bath was cool. _He calculated upon the probable necessity of its enjoyment_.") The spirit is the silliest and most ignorant Philhellenism--all the beauty, virtue, wisdom, of the ancient Greeks being supposed to be inherited by their mongrel successors of the early nineteenth century. An English and a Turkish lover dispute Ida's affection or possession. There are the elaborate pseudo-erudite notes which one has learnt to associate chiefly with Moore. The authoress boasts in her preface that she "has already written almost as many volumes as she has years," and that she has hardly ever corrected her proofs. Perhaps this silliness will make some think her not more an example of the savagery of contemporary criticism than a justification thereof. It was in fact not only brutal man who objected to the preposterous excesses of pseudo-romance: and serious or jocular parables were taken up against it, if not before _Northanger Abbey_ was written, long before it was published. In 1810 a certain "G." or "S.G.," whose full name was Sarah Green, wrote, besides some actual history and an attempt at the historical novel, a very curious and rather hybrid book entitled _Romance Readers and Romance Writers_. Its preface is an instance of "Women, beware Women," for though it stigmatises male creatures, such as a certain Curteis and a certain Pickersgill, it treats Lady Morgan (then only Sydney Owenson) and "Rosa Matilda" even more roughly and asks (as has been asked about a hundred years later and was asked about a hundred years before), "Is it not amazing that the [two] most licentious writers of romance are women?" And it starts with a burlesque account of a certain Margaret Marsham who exclaims, "What then? to add to my earthly miseries am I to be called Peggy? My name is Margari_tt_a!" "I am sure that if I am called Peggy again I shall go into a fit." But this promise of something to complete the trio with _Northanger Abbey_ and _The Heroine_ (to be presently mentioned) is not maintained. Not only does the writer force the note of parody too much by making "Margaritta"
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159  
160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
preface
 
called
 
written
 

Romance

 
hundred
 

Northanger

 
pseudo
 
romance
 

natural

 

attempt


Writers

 
creatures
 

beware

 

stigmatises

 

instance

 
parody
 

making

 

Margaritta

 

published

 

hybrid


entitled

 

curious

 

actual

 

history

 

historical

 

Readers

 

Sydney

 

miseries

 
maintained
 
Margari

earthly

 
Marsham
 

exclaims

 

promise

 

complete

 

presently

 

mentioned

 

Margaret

 

account

 

Owenson


Matilda

 
roughly
 

Heroine

 

Morgan

 

Curteis

 
Pickersgill
 
treats
 

writers

 

starts

 
burlesque