FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131  
132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   >>   >|  
conduct of the sheriff I must pronounce to be most unwarranted and unfounded." And this discriminating judge continued to show that the imputation was so--concluding with the assertion that the sheriff "had done his duty in the case." Then without pausing, he proceeded to the usual lecture, full of hypocritical cant with which British judges usually preface their awards, however infamous. He alluded to the personal condition of Mr. Mitchel, and expressed his regrets that a person of such merits should be in such circumstances, Then having dilated on the enormity of the offence, he assured Mr. Mitchel that he had been found guilty of many heinous charges against the Queen and the Imperial Crown, and among others, of felonious intending to levy war upon that gentlewoman, and that the evidence was furnished by the prisoner's self. "How, therefore," he continued, "you think yourself justified in calling it the verdict of a packed jury, and thus imputing perjury to twelve of your countrymen--deliberate and wilful perjury--" "No," interrupted the prisoner, "I did not impute perjury to the jury." "I understood," said the speaker on the bench, "that you had stated, in arrest of judgment, that you had been found guilty by a packed jury." "I did," was the reply. Robert Holmes rose, during the judge's speech, and said, "My lords, with the greatest respect, what I said was, that though he might be statutably guilty, he was not, in my opinion, morally guilty. I repeat that opinion now." This avowal, so boldly and firmly made by the veteran Republican, was answered by all the audience, not pensioned, with plaudits. Baron Lefroy would say no more on that point, only that the court could not acquiesce in a line of defence "which appeared to it very little short of, or amounting to, as objectionable matter as that for which the prisoner had been found guilty. "I," replied the aged advocate, "I am answerable for that under your Act of Parliament." Loud applause followed. "Are there no policemen in court?" shouted Baron Lefroy. The High Sheriff "had given strict orders," he said, "to have all removed who would interrupt." "Make prisoners of them," said the judge. "I wish you to understand," he continued, still excited, and addressing Mr. Mitchel, who during these episodes, stood unmoved, "that we have with the utmost anxiety and with a view to come to a decision upon the measure of punishment which it would be our duty to
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131  
132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

guilty

 

prisoner

 

perjury

 

Mitchel

 

continued

 

Lefroy

 

packed

 

sheriff

 
opinion
 

appeared


defence
 

acquiesce

 

Republican

 
morally
 

repeat

 
statutably
 
respect
 

avowal

 

answered

 

audience


pensioned

 

plaudits

 
veteran
 

boldly

 
firmly
 

answerable

 

understand

 

excited

 
addressing
 

prisoners


orders

 

removed

 

interrupt

 

episodes

 

decision

 

measure

 

punishment

 

anxiety

 
unmoved
 
utmost

strict

 

advocate

 

greatest

 

replied

 

matter

 

amounting

 

objectionable

 

Parliament

 

shouted

 

Sheriff