FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   >>  
not have avoided it without national dishonour. I am fully alive to the fact that whenever a nation has been engaged in any war she has always invoked the sacred name of honour. Many a crime has been committed in its name; there are some crimes being committed now. But, all the same, national honour is a reality, and any nation that disregards it is doomed. Why is our honour as a country involved in this war? Because, in the first place, we are bound in an honourable obligation to defend the independence, the liberty, the integrity of a small neighbour that has lived peaceably, but she could not have compelled us, because she was weak. The man who declines to discharge his debt because his creditor is too poor to enforce it is a blackguard. We entered into this treaty, a solemn treaty, a full treaty, to defend Belgium and her integrity. Our signatures are attached to the document. Our signatures do not stand alone there. This was not the only country to defend the integrity of Belgium. Russia, France, Austria, and Prussia--they are all there. Why did they not perform the obligation? It is suggested that if we quote this treaty it is purely an excuse on our part. It is our low craft and cunning, just to cloak our jealousy of a superior civilization we are attempting to destroy. Our answer is the action we took in 1870. What was that? Mr. Gladstone was then Prime Minister. Lord Granville, I think, was then Foreign Secretary. I have never heard it laid to their charge that they were ever jingo. What did they do in 1870? That Treaty Bond was this: We called upon the belligerent Powers to respect that treaty. We called upon France; we called upon Germany. At that time, bear in mind, the greatest danger to Belgium came from France and not from Germany. We intervened to protect Belgium against France exactly as we are doing now to protect her against Germany. We are proceeding exactly in the same way. We invited both the belligerent Powers to state that they had no intention of violating Belgian territory. What was the answer given by Bismarck? He said it was superfluous to ask Prussia such a question in view of the treaties in force. France gave a similar answer. We received the thanks at that time from the Belgian people for our intervention in a very remarkable document. This is the document addressed by the municipality of Brussels to Queen Victoria after that intervention: The great and noble people over whose des
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   >>  



Top keywords:

treaty

 

France

 
Belgium
 

called

 

answer

 
honour
 
Germany
 
document
 

defend

 

integrity


Belgian
 

obligation

 

Powers

 
belligerent
 
Prussia
 
protect
 
signatures
 

committed

 

people

 
national

nation

 

intervention

 

country

 

Treaty

 

superfluous

 
Brussels
 

Victoria

 

respect

 

Granville

 

question


Minister

 

Foreign

 
charge
 

Secretary

 

invited

 

Bismarck

 

proceeding

 
similar
 

territory

 

violating


intention

 

received

 

remarkable

 

addressed

 

municipality

 
greatest
 
intervened
 

danger

 

treaties

 

Austria