ibe to
the Roman Catholic troops, especially the Italian part.
[97] So late as January, 1561, he wrote: "Quant a la religion, que sa
Majeste se peult asseure que je viveray et moreray en icelle." Gachard,
Correspondance de Guillaume le Taciturne, ii. 6.
[98] "Et suis mervilleusement mari de veoir comme ces mechantes heresies
se augmente partout," etc.
[99] "Qu'il fasse tout debvoir du monde, tant par puplication, comme par
force (autant qui j'en porrois la avoir) de remedier a telle desordre, qui
est si domagable a tout la christiente."
[100] Letter to Card. Granvelle, Oct. 21, 1560, Gachard, i. 461-463.
[101] De Thou (whose graphic account I have principally followed), iii.
226-228; J. de Serres, ii. 183, 184; Hist. eccles. des egl. ref., iii.
164-167.
[102] Agrippa d'Aubigne has inserted in his history (i. 154-156) an
interesting conversation which he held with the Baron des Adrets, then an
old man, a dozen years later, in the city of Lyons. In answer to the
question, Why he had resorted to acts of cruelty unbecoming to his great
valor? the baron replied that no one commits cruelty in avenging cruelty;
for, if the first measures are _cruelty_, the second are _justice_. His
severities, he urged, were needed in order to show proper spirit in view
of the past, and proper regard for the future. His soldiers must be forced
to commit themselves beyond hope of pardon--they must, especially in a war
in which their opponents cloaked themselves with the royal authority,
fight without respect of persons. "The soldier cannot be taught," said he
with characteristic bluntness, "to carry his sword and his hat in his hand
at the same time." When asked what motive he had in subsequently leaving
his old comrades in arms, he explained that it was neither fear nor
avarice, but disgust at their timid policy and at seeing himself
superseded. And to D'Aubigne's third question--a somewhat bold one, it
must be confessed--Why success had never attended his recent undertakings,
he answered "with a sigh": "_Mon enfant_, nothing is too warm for a
captain who has no greater anxiety for victory than have his soldiers.
With the Huguenots I had _soldiers_; since then I have had only
_hucksters_, who cared for nothing but money. The former were moved by
apprehension unmingled with fear, and revenge, passion, and honor were the
wages they fought for. I could not give those Huguenot soldiers _reins_
enough; the others have worn out my _spurs
|