FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   >>   >|  
y did not mean to have any new slave States. Otherwise they certainly did mean to make this distinction, for nothing can be clearer than that Louisiana and Missouri cannot go to Ohio to recover fugitive slaves within the meaning of this "compact of the fathers;" while Georgia can. Manifestly we have departed from the system devised by the fathers in allowing Missouri, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Florida to be admitted with slavery, which explains, and nothing else can, this anomalous condition of things. There can be no escape from these conclusions, but to deny that the ordinance has ever had any validity under the Constitution; which would be scarcely less than to deny that the Constitution itself had ever been a valid instrument. Having the like unequivocal sanction of national authority, and expressing alike in the words of Mr. Toombs, "the collective will of the whole," they must stand or fall together. Originally the territory was not divided by the line of 36 deg. 30', or by any other line giving part to freedom and part to slavery. It was all secured, and by consent of the South, to freedom. There is nothing, therefore, in the original compromise, to justify the remark of the Editor of the Boston _Courier_ in a recent number of that paper, that "below the line of 36 deg. 30', the South have the right of prescription." Freedom has an older prescriptive right to all the Territories. The line established by the compromise, between slavery permitted and slavery prohibited, was the boundary line between the then existing States and the Territory of the United States; or the line between exclusive national jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of the States. It is an erroneous assumption, therefore, that the free States, by the introduction of slavery south of 36 deg. 30', as well as north of it, would receive more than a fair share or moiety of rights and privileges, as between States or parties entitled to equal privileges. The idea that the extension of slavery under the Federal Government can be claimed by anybody south or north as a right, is wholly inadmissible. The _Courier_ will hold the following declarations from Mr. WEBSTER to be good authority, if others do not: "Wherever there is a foot of land to be staid back from becoming slave territory, I am ready to assert the principle of excluding slavery." "We are to use the first and last, and every occasion which offers, to oppose the e
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239  
240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
slavery
 

States

 

national

 

authority

 

Constitution

 

Courier

 

jurisdiction

 

privileges

 

compromise

 
freedom

territory

 

Missouri

 

Louisiana

 

fathers

 

receive

 

parties

 

entitled

 
rights
 
introduction
 
moiety

erroneous

 

established

 

Otherwise

 

permitted

 

Territories

 

prescriptive

 

prohibited

 

boundary

 
exclusive
 

assumption


United
 
Territory
 

existing

 
extension
 
assert
 
principle
 

excluding

 

offers

 
oppose
 
occasion

inadmissible
 

wholly

 

Federal

 
Government
 
claimed
 

declarations

 

WEBSTER

 

Wherever

 

Freedom

 

instrument