FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140  
141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   >>   >|  
ell as Receive it.--Defence against Water from Higher Land.--Open Ditches.--Headers.--Silt-basins. DISTANCE OF DRAINS.--Depends on Soil, Depth, Climate, Prices, System.--Conclusions as to Distance. DEPTH OF DRAINS.--Greatly Increases Cost.--Shallow Drains first tried in England.--10,000 Miles of Shallow Drains laid in Scotland by way of Education.--Drains must be below Subsoil plow, and Frost.--Effect of Frost on Tiles and Aqueducts. DIRECTION OF DRAINS. Whether drains should run up and down the slope of the hill, or directly across it, or in a diagonal line as a compromise between the first two, are questions which beginners in the art and mystery of drainage usually discuss with great zeal. It seems so plain to one man, at the first glance, that, in order to catch the water that is running down under the soil upon the subsoil, from the top of the hill to the bottom, you must cut a ditch across the current, that he sees no occasion to examine the question farther. Another, whose idea is, to catch the water in his drain before it rises to the surface, as it is passing up from below or running along on the subsoil, and keep it from rising higher than the bottom of his ditch, thinks it quite as obvious that the drains should run up and down the slope, that the water, once entering, may remain in the drain, going directly down hill to the outlet. A third hits on the Keythorpe system, and regarding the water as flowing down the slope, under the soil, in certain natural channels in the subsoil, fancies they may best be cut off by drains, in the nature of mains, running diagonally across the slope. These different ideas of men, if examined, will be found to result mainly from their different notions of the underground circulation of water. In considering the Theory of Moisture, an attempt was made to suggest the different causes of the wetness of land. To drain land effectually, we must have a correct idea of the sources of the water that makes the particular field too wet; whether it falls from the clouds directly upon it; or whether it falls on land situated above it and sloping towards it, so that the water runs down, as upon a roof, from other fields or slopes to our own; or whether it gushes up in springs which find vent in particular spots, and so is diffused through the soil. If we have only to take care of the water that falls on our own field, from the clouds,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140  
141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
running
 

Drains

 

directly

 
drains
 
DRAINS
 
subsoil
 

clouds

 

bottom

 

Shallow

 

result


examined
 
notions
 

underground

 

attempt

 

Moisture

 

Theory

 

circulation

 

system

 

flowing

 

Keythorpe


outlet
 

natural

 

nature

 
diagonally
 

channels

 
fancies
 
suggest
 

fields

 

slopes

 

Receive


sloping

 

gushes

 
springs
 
diffused
 

situated

 
effectually
 

Ditches

 

Headers

 

wetness

 

correct


sources

 

Defence

 
Higher
 

entering

 
discuss
 
drainage
 

mystery

 

England

 
beginners
 

glance