FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  
is a delusion (or at least, in the last resort, a negligible element) and that man is but one of the many phenomena or facts of a physical universe--then we may continue, indeed, as some evolutionary and naturalistic thinkers do, to speak of a science of Ethics, but such a science will not be a study of the moral life as we understand it and have defined it. Ethics, therefore, while dependent upon the philosophical sciences, has its own distinct content and scope. The end of life, that for which a man should live, with all its implications, forms the subject of moral inquiry. It is {21} concerned not merely with what a man is or actually does, but more specifically with what he should be and should do. Hence, as we have seen, the word 'ought' is the most distinctive term of Ethics involving a consideration of values and a relation of the actual and the ideal. The 'ought' of life constitutes at once the purpose, law, and reason of conduct. It proposes the three great questions involved in all ethical inquiry--whither? how? and why? and determines the three great words which are constantly recurring in every ethical system--end, norm, motive. Moral good is the moral end considered as realised. The moral norm or rule impelling the will to the realisation of this end is called Duty. The moral motive considered as an acquired power of the acting will is called Virtue.[11] [1] Cf. Mackenzie, _Manual of Ethics_, p. 32; also Wuttke, _Christian Ethics_ (Eng. Trans.), vol. i. p. 14. [2] _Metaph. of Morals_, sect. i. [3] Mackenzie, _Manual of Ethics_, p. 8. See also Muirhead, _Elements of Ethics_. [4] Hyslop, _Elements of Ethics_, p. 1. [5] Schiller, _Ueber Anmuth und Wuerde_. Cf. also Ruskin, _Mod. Painters_, vol. ii.; Seeley, _Natural Religion_, and Inge, _Faith and its Psychology_, p. 203 ff. See also Bosanquet _Hist. of Aesthetic_. We are indebted to _Romanticism_, and especially to Novalis in Germany and Cousin in France for the thought that the good and the beautiful meet and amalgamate in God. [6] Browning. [7] Cf. Newman Smyth, _Christian Ethics_, p. 8. [8] See Author's _History of Philosophy_, p. 585. [9] Introduction to Hume's _Works_. [10] Mackenzie seems to imply this view. _Ethics_, p. 25. [11] Cf. Haering, _Ethics of the Christian Life_, p. 9. {22} CHAPTER II THE POSTULATES OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS We now proceed to define Christian Ethics and to investigate the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44  
45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ethics

 

Christian

 

Mackenzie

 

motive

 

inquiry

 
ethical
 

Elements

 

considered

 

called

 

science


Manual
 

Hyslop

 

Painters

 

Seeley

 

Wuerde

 

Anmuth

 

Schiller

 
Ruskin
 

proceed

 

Wuttke


define

 

investigate

 

ETHICS

 

Muirhead

 

Natural

 

Metaph

 
Morals
 
Aesthetic
 

Philosophy

 
POSTULATES

History

 

Author

 

Browning

 
Newman
 

Introduction

 

CHAPTER

 

Haering

 

indebted

 
Romanticism
 

Bosanquet


Psychology

 

Novalis

 

beautiful

 

amalgamate

 

CHRISTIAN

 

thought

 
Germany
 
Cousin
 

France

 

Religion