VETO MESSAGE.
WASHINGTON, _February 20, 1845_.
_To the Senate of the United States_:
I herewith return the bill entitled "An act relating to revenue cutters
and steamers," with the following objections to its becoming a law:
The Executive has found it necessary and esteemed it important to the
public interests to direct the building of two revenue boats, to be
propelled by wind or steam, as occasion may require--the one for the
coast of Georgia and the other for Mobile Bay, to be used as dispatch
vessels if necessary. The models have been furnished by the Navy
Department and side wheels have been ordered, as being best tested and
least liable to failure. The one boat is directed to be built at
Richmond, Va., the other at Pittsburg, Pa., and contracts have been
regularly entered into for their construction. The contractors have made
and are making all necessary arrangements in procuring materials and
sites for building, etc., and have doubtless been at considerable
expense in the necessary preparations for completing their engagements.
It was no part of the intention of the Senate in originating the bill,
I am well convinced, to violate the sanctity of contracts regularly
entered into by the Government. The language of the act, nevertheless,
is of a character to produce in all probability that effect. Its
language is "that no revenue cutter or revenue steamer shall hereafter
be built _(excepting such as are now in the course of building or
equipment_) nor purchased unless an appropriation be first made by law
therefor." The _building_ of the two cutters under contract can not be
said properly to have commenced, although preparations have been made
for building; but even if the construction be ambiguous, it is better
that all ambiguity should be removed and thus the hazard of violating
the pledged faith of the country be removed along with it.
I am free to confess that, existing contracts being guarded and
protected, the law to operate _in futuro_ would be regarded as both
proper and wise.
With these objections, I return the bill to the House in which it
originated for its final constitutional action.
JOHN TYLER.
PROCLAMATION.
[From Senate Journal, Twenty-eighth Congress, second session, p. 271.]
WASHINGTON, _January 8, 1845_.
_To the Senators of the United States, respectively_.
SIR: Objects interesting to the United States requiring that the Senate
should be in session on Tues
|