FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   >>  
sons 1. Because no woman will leave her domestic duties to vote. 2. Because no woman who may vote will attend to her domestic duties. 3. Because it will make dissension between husband and wife. 4. Because every woman will vote as her husband tells her to. 5. Because bad women will corrupt politics. 6. Because bad politics will corrupt women. 7. Because women have no power of organization. 8. Because women will form a solid party and outvote men. 9. Because men and women are so different that they must stick to different duties. 10. Because men and women are so much alike that men, with one vote each, can represent their own views and ours too. 11. Because women cannot use force. 12. Because the militants did use force. Why We Oppose Pockets for Women 1. Because pockets are not a natural right. 2. Because the great majority of women do not want pockets. If they did they would have them. 3. Because whenever women have had pockets they have not used them. 4. Because women are required to carry enough things as it is, without the additional burden of pockets. 5. Because it would make dissension between husband and wife as to whose pockets were to be filled. 6. Because it would destroy man's chivalry toward woman, if he did not have to carry all her things in his pockets. 7. Because men are men, and women are women. We must not fly in the face of nature. 8. Because pockets have been used by men to carry tobacco, pipes, whiskey flasks, chewing gum and compromising letters. We see no reason to suppose that women would use them more wisely. Fashion Notes: Past and Present 1880--Anti-suffrage arguments are being worn long, calm and flowing this year, with the dominant note that of woman's intellectual inferiority. 1890--Violence is very evident in this season's modes, and our more conservative thinkers are saying that woman suffrage threatens the home, the Church and the Republic. 1900--A complete change of style has taken place. Everything is being worn _a l'aristocrate_, with the repeated assertion that too many people are voting already. 1915--The best line of goods shown by the leading anti-suffrage houses this spring is the statement that woman suffrage is the same thing as free love. The effect is extremely piquant and surprising. Why We Oppose Women Travelling in Railway Trains 1. Because travelling in trains is not a natural right.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   >>  



Top keywords:

Because

 

pockets

 

suffrage

 

duties

 

husband

 

things

 

Oppose

 

natural

 

politics

 

corrupt


domestic
 

dissension

 

season

 
Church
 

Republic

 

threatens

 

evident

 

conservative

 
thinkers
 

Violence


travelling

 

arguments

 
trains
 

Present

 

flowing

 
Trains
 

inferiority

 

Travelling

 

intellectual

 

Railway


dominant
 

change

 
voting
 
people
 

houses

 

spring

 

statement

 

leading

 

surprising

 

complete


Everything
 

piquant

 

repeated

 

assertion

 
effect
 

extremely

 

aristocrate

 

represent

 

majority

 
Pockets