FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   >>  
sted for women, the question is: "Will it benefit men?" Why We Oppose Votes for Men 1. Because man's place is the armory. 2. Because no really manly man wants to settle any question otherwise than by fighting about it. 3. Because if men should adopt peaceable methods women will no longer look up to them. 4. Because men will lose their charm if they step out of their natural sphere and interest themselves in other matters than feats of arms, uniforms and drums. 5. Because men are too emotional to vote. Their conduct at baseball games and political conventions shows this, while their innate tendency to appeal to force renders them peculiarly unfit for the task of government. The Logic of the Law In 1875 the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in denying the petition of women to practise before it said: "It would be shocking to man's reverence for womanhood and faith in woman ... that woman should be permitted to mix professionally in all the nastiness which finds its way into courts of justice." It then names thirteen subjects as unfit for the attention of women--three of them are crimes committed against women. Consistency ("Vile insults, lewd talk and brutal conduct were used by the indicted men to frighten respectable women who went to the polls in Terre Haute at the last election, asserted District Attorney Dailey."--_Press Dispatch_.) Are the polls unfit for decent women? No, sir, they are perfectly orderly. Tut, tut! Go there at once and swear and be brutal, or what will become of our anti-suffrage argument? Sometimes We're Ivy, and Sometimes We're Oak Is it true that the English government is calling on women to do work abandoned by men? Yes, it is true. Is not woman's place the home? No, not when men need her services outside the home. Will she never be told again that her place is the home? Oh, yes, indeed. When? As soon as men want their jobs back again. Do You Know That in 1869 Miss Jex-Blake and four other women entered for a medical degree at the University of Edinburgh? That the president of the College of Physicians refused to give the women the prizes they had won? That the undergraduates insulted any professor who allowed women to compete for prizes? That the women were stoned in the streets, and finally excluded from the medical school? That in 1877 the British Medical Association declared women ineli
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   >>  



Top keywords:

Because

 

brutal

 

medical

 

question

 

conduct

 

prizes

 

government

 

Sometimes

 

argument

 

English


abandoned
 

calling

 

decent

 
election
 

perfectly

 

orderly

 

asserted

 

Attorney

 
Dailey
 

Dispatch


District

 

suffrage

 
undergraduates
 

insulted

 

professor

 
allowed
 

president

 

Edinburgh

 

College

 

Physicians


refused
 

compete

 
stoned
 
Medical
 

British

 

Association

 

declared

 

school

 

streets

 

finally


excluded
 

University

 

degree

 

services

 
entered
 

uniforms

 

matters

 

natural

 

sphere

 
interest