FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810  
811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   >>   >|  
e's. But it is not for Congress to refuse to hear the applications of their fellow citizens, while those applications contain nothing unconstitutional or offensive. What is the object of the address before us? It is intended to bring before this House a subject of great importance to the cause of humanity; there are certain facts to be enquired into, and the memorialists are ready to give all the information in their power; they are waiting, at a great distance from their homes, and wish to return; if, then, it will be proper to commit the petition to-morrow, it will be equally proper to-day, for it is conformable to our practice, beside, it will tend to their conveniency. Mr. LAWRANCE (of N.Y.) The gentleman from South Carolina says, the petitioners are of a society not known in the laws or Constitution. Sir, in all our acts, as well as in the Constitution, we have noticed this Society; or why is it that we admit them to affirm, in cases where others are called upon to swear? If we pay this attention to them, in one instance, what good reason is there for contemning them in another? I think the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. STONE,) carries his apprehensions too far, when he fears that negro-property will fall in value, by the suppression of the slave-trade; not that I suppose it immediately in the power of Congress to abolish a traffic which is a disgrace to human nature; but it appears to me, that, if the importation was crushed, the value of a slave would be increased instead of diminished; however, considerations of this kind have nothing to do with the present question; gentlemen may acquiesce in the commitment of the memorial, without pledging themselves to support its object. Mr. JACKSON, (of Ga.) I differ much in opinion with the gentleman last up. I apprehend if, through the interference of the general government, the slave trade was abolished, it would evince to the people a disposition toward a total emancipation, and they would hold their property in jeopardy. Any extraordinary attention of Congress to this petition may have, in some degree, a similar effect. I would beg to ask those, then, who are so desirous of freeing the negroes, if they have funds sufficient to pay for them? If they have, they may come forward on that business with some propriety; but, if they have not, they should keep themselves quiet, and not interfere with a business in which they are not interested. They may as well come forwar
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810  
811   812   813   814   815   816   817   818   819   820   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831   832   833   834   835   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

gentleman

 

Congress

 
property
 

petition

 

Constitution

 

attention

 

proper

 
applications
 

business

 

object


diminished

 

increased

 

propriety

 

present

 
question
 

sufficient

 

forward

 

considerations

 

importation

 

interfere


suppose

 

immediately

 
abolish
 
interested
 
suppression
 

forwar

 
traffic
 

appears

 
disgrace
 
nature

crushed
 

freeing

 
effect
 
abolished
 

evince

 

government

 
interference
 
general
 

people

 
similar

emancipation

 

extraordinary

 

degree

 

disposition

 

apprehend

 

pledging

 
desirous
 

support

 
memorial
 

commitment