FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  
wn to table Napoleon with great gallantry told the beautiful Queen that he would restore to her Silesia, a province which she earnestly wished should be retained in the new arrangements which were necessarily about to take place. --[Las Cases mentions that at the time of the treaty of Tilsit Napoleon wrote to the Empress Josephine as follows: "'The Queen of Prussia is really a charming woman. She is fond of coquetting with me; but do not be jealous: I am like oilcloth, along which everything of this sort elides without penetrating. It would cost me too dear to play the gallant' "On this subject an anecdote was related in the salon of Josephine. It was said that the Queen of Prussia one day had a beautiful rose in her hand, which the Emperor asked her to give him. The Queen hesitated for a few moments, and then presented it to him, saying, 'Why should I so readily grant what you request, while you remain deaf to all my entreaties?' (She alluded to the fortress of Magdeburg, which she had earnestly solicited)." (Memorial de St. Helene).]-- The treaty of peace concluded at Tilsit between France and Russia, on the 7th of July, and ratified two days after, produced no less striking a change in the geographical division of Europe than had been effected the year preceding by the Treaty of Presburg. The treaty contained no stipulation dishonourable to Russia, whose territory was preserved inviolate; but how was Prussia treated? Some historians, for the vain pleasure of flattering by posthumous praises the pretended moderation of Napoleon, have almost reproached him for having suffered some remnants of the monarchy of the great Frederick to survive. There is, nevertheless, a point on which Napoleon has been wrongfully condemned, at least with reference to the campaign of 1807. It has been said that he should at that period have re-established the kingdom of Poland; and certainly there is every reason to regret, for the interests of France and Europe, that it was not re-established. But when a desire, even founded on reason, is not carried into effect, should we conclude that the wished-for object ought to be achieved in defiance of all obstacles? At that time, that is to say, during the campaign of Tilsit, insurmountable obstacles existed. If, however, by the Treaty of Tilsit, the throne of Poland was not restored to serve as a barrier between old Europe and the Empire of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774  
775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798   799   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Tilsit
 

Napoleon

 

treaty

 

Prussia

 

Europe

 

campaign

 
established
 

reason

 

Poland

 

Josephine


obstacles
 

earnestly

 

France

 
wished
 
Russia
 
Treaty
 

beautiful

 
suffered
 

praises

 

posthumous


pretended

 

geographical

 

division

 

reproached

 

moderation

 
change
 

pleasure

 
contained
 

inviolate

 

Presburg


preserved

 

territory

 

stipulation

 

preceding

 
dishonourable
 

flattering

 
historians
 

treated

 

effected

 

achieved


defiance

 

object

 

conclude

 
carried
 

effect

 
barrier
 
Empire
 

restored

 
throne
 
insurmountable