FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185  
186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>   >|  
e answer. Here the anthropologist and physiologist come in with their methods, and even those, we think, can throw but an uncertain light on the very 'origin' of institutions, and on strictly primitive man. For the purposes of this discussion, we shall here re-state the chief points at issue between the adherents of Sir Henry Maine and of Mr. M'Lennan, between historical and anthropological inquirers. 1. Did man _originally_ live in the patriarchal family, or did he live in more or less modified promiscuity, with uncertainty of blood-ties, and especially of male parentage? 2. Did circumstances and customs at some time compel or induce man (whatever his _original_ condition) to resort to practices which made paternity uncertain, and so caused kinship to be reckoned through women? 3. Granting that some races have been thus reduced to matriarchal forms of the family--that is, to forms in which the woman is the permanent recognised centre--is there any reason to suppose that the stronger peoples, like the Aryans and the Semites, ever passed through a stage of culture in which female, not male, kinship was chiefly recognised, probably as a result of polyandry, of many husbands to one wife? On this third question, it will be necessary to produce much evidence of very different sorts: evidence which, at best, can perhaps only warrant an inference, or presumption, in favour of one or the other opinion. For the moment, the impartial examination of testimony is more important and practicable than the establishment of any theory. (1) Did man _originally_ live in the patriarchal family, the male being master of his female mate or mates, and of his children? On this first point Sir Henry Maine, in his new volume,[206] may be said to come as near proving his case as the nature and matter of the question will permit. Bachofen, M'Lennan, and Morgan, all started from a hypothetical state of more or less modified sexual promiscuity. Bachofen's evidence (which may be referred to later) was based on a great mass of legends, myths, and travellers' tales, chiefly about early Aryan practices. He discovered _Hetaerismus_, as he called it, or promiscuity, among Lydians, Etruscans, Persians, Thracians, Cyrenian nomads, Egyptians, Scythians, Troglodytes, Nasamones, and so forth. Mr. M'Lennan's view is, perhaps, less absolutely stated than Sir Henry Maine supposes. M'Lennan says[207] 'that there has been a stage in the development of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185  
186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Lennan
 

promiscuity

 

evidence

 

family

 

practices

 

modified

 

patriarchal

 

question

 

Bachofen

 
chiefly

kinship

 

recognised

 

female

 

uncertain

 

originally

 

volume

 

children

 
proving
 
answer
 
Morgan

permit

 

matter

 

nature

 

opinion

 

moment

 

favour

 

presumption

 

warrant

 
inference
 

impartial


examination
 
theory
 

master

 
establishment
 
anthropologist
 
testimony
 

important

 

practicable

 
started
 
hypothetical

nomads
 

Egyptians

 

Scythians

 
Troglodytes
 
Cyrenian
 

Thracians

 

Lydians

 

Etruscans

 

Persians

 

Nasamones